College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In the aforementioned statement it is advised for students to persue fields that interest them over fields that will lead for a secure career. The advice might sound like a good one, when first encounted. Yet, college students should not be encourged to not plan a head for their post college life.
First, most college students who further their education, do not come from a soci-economic condition which alowes them to forget about career plan and economical obligatons. For example, in an education system like in United States, the tuition is very high and the students will need to pay back loans one way or the other. Thus, they should not neglect their ability to pay back money to their loaners; they should sharpen their financial skills with courses that provide them the means to pay back their borrowed money.
Another issue that may rise from the statement is that all students are alike. It’s clearly that some students have talent in a very specifivc field, and these students might find it particularly wastefull and maybe even to the state of devestation of their academic career if they will be forced to take classes outside of their propencity. For such students it can be almost impossible to even pass courses that are not inherent to their diploma.
Further more, most schools already do propse variety of multi-diciplanry programs for the students who do whish to participate in a wider education. It is possible in most Universities to take classes from different faculties and complete double majors or similar programs which involve “the best of both worlds”, as far as job and interest don’t collide.
Finally, it dose not have to be that way of contrasting relationship between interest and job as reflected in the “rather than” part of the statement. Some of the most prolific people in history could leverage their interest in academic stage to a ground breaking career as graduates. John Lennon studied art, Andy Warhol studied commercial arts, Albert Einstein had interest in physics. And that was just to name just a few. People do excel when they do something they like and naturaly inclined to.
To conclude, it is important to develop ones interest. But from the given above reasons it is essential not to neglect the economic side of the equation. Because, after college it’s a hard day’s night.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the aforementioned statement it is advised for students to ...
^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doses'?
Suggestion: doses
...rest don't collide. Finally, it dose not have to be that way of contrasting ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 41, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...To conclude, it is important to develop ones interest. But from the given above reas...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231947483589 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.148796498906 0.157235817809 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.074398249453 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0722100656455 0.0497285424764 145% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0590809628009 0.0444667217837 133% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0962800875274 0.12292977631 78% => OK
Participles: 0.0218818380744 0.0406280797675 54% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6904175838 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0437636761488 0.030933414821 141% => OK
Particles: 0.00437636761488 0.0016655270985 263% => OK
Determiners: 0.0765864332604 0.0997080785238 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0240700218818 0.0249443105267 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0240700218818 0.0148568991511 162% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2389.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 394.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06345177665 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373096446701 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286802030457 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203045685279 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111675126904 0.132149295362 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6904175838 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545685279188 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 61.9066067005 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7368421053 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.072393999 59.4972553346 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.736842105 141.124799967 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.421052631579 0.674092028746 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 49.4170451509 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.25 1.64882698954 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435702638915 0.391690518653 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0978397478019 0.123202303941 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0863086959804 0.077325440228 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52988198848 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144328754119 0.149214159877 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161346360131 0.161403998019 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662576784413 0.0892212321368 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.295942129091 0.385218514788 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0465497304148 0.0692045440612 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269129661228 0.275328986314 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383388582281 0.0653680567796 59% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.