Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In today's competitive world companies strive to excel in any way possible. One of those ways is to monitor employees activities. A specific way to monitor this activity is by routinly performing checks on email. The author posits that companies should conduct such check ups. This is a complex issue that involves lifes of many individuals. Therefore, companies should use monitoring but with respect to their workers privacy and well being.
First, there is a little doubt that roaming around in work can be deleterious and wasteful for any organization. it is a known secret that checking email can reduce productivity levels on any size of organization. As a freelancer I can share how such activities of engaging in email and social networking consumed my working day and sometimes even weeks. So monitoring can be an effective way to address such issue with ace. a monitoring device which installed on a personal computer can show the accumulated time that is being virtualy thrown off when emailing, and that is just the raw time without calculating the distruction effects that cause emailers to lose focus while emailing again and again.
As a result of the forementioned behavior, the productivity of the whole organization is risked. In that sense, looking for and deploying systems to monitor workers habits is a good move by the management. When working hours are used for working everyone is benefiting: same amount of value is achieved in a lesser amount of time. Which, at least in theory but also in practice in very productive states like Germany, more time for the employees in their life outside work. In productive states like Germany, the workers work for less time and gain better results. One main reasons for this phenomena is the high work ethic of the German people. When they go to work they do just that, work. And that allows many of the Germans to enjoy a seven hours working day.
Notwithstanding the improvement in productivity some issues of working benefits and well being should be addressed by companies before proscribing monitoring on their employees. First and foremost, privacy. Privacy is an important civil right. An employee should not be monitored as far as that other employees will have access to their private information. For example, last week, I happened to encounter a facebook post which one person described private chat of another person at work, deriding it. Personaly, it fealt unmoral act to me. Shaming is indeed one of the many risks that companies should address regarding the well being of their employees before employing such policy.
To conclude, financialy it seems that the move for monitoring emails will be more than reasonable. Yet, companies should really secure the well being of their employees before deploying the monitoring of email. This is a complex issue that requires a certain vision from the firm that emables it to protect the workers rights while enhancing productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ious and wasteful for any organization. it is a known secret that checking email c...
^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...ive way to address such issue with ace. a monitoring device which installed on a ...
^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...in better results. One main reasons for this phenomena is the high work ethic of the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, as a result, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2478.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07786885246 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77540729426 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7094291699 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4482758621 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8275862069 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34482758621 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243677586806 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660882792766 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657192270983 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151615490216 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668521378786 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.