Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Email communication is one of the most important ways of communication in our modern work environment. All the employees interact among themselves using email. The prompt recommends that company management should conduct routine monitoring of all the employee email correspondence. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion and argue that this program actually wastes more resources than the current approach for the following reasons.
To begin, Work culture is any important factor for any successful organization irrespective of their fields. Employees should feel confident in expressing their thoughts and it is the responsibility of the company to create this environment. Employees might feel insecure knowing their emails are constantly being monitored by the management which ultimately affect their productivity.
Further, Amount of resources specially allocated for this monitoring is a huge burden on the small and medium scale companies. Even in the case of large corporations it is very difficult to monitor thousands of employee email workflow.
Of Course, Some might argue that email monitoring might protect companies from lawsuits. However, these legal issues might be resolved by providing ethics and compliance training to the employees. It is more economic and the privacy of their employees is not compromised in any manner which leads to the flourish of new innovations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt approach for the following reasons. To begin, Work culture is any important ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ultimately affect their productivity. Further, Amount of resources specially a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thousands of employee email workflow. Of Course, Some might argue that email m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 212.0 442.535393258 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66509433962 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.55969084622 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09256665153 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 704.065955056 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1736954098 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.083333333 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227957480426 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881686587187 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893908582125 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13277036469 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272331298127 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.