Employees form the core of the company. Having effective employees results in increased productivity of the company. However, there will always be a few egregious individuals who want to harm the company or pursue their own self interests. These individual can causes significant damages to the company and can be precluded by routinely monitoring employee mails. Although it is important to give an employee some degree of privacy, it is much more important to safeguard their jobs; which they might lose due to the damages incurred by the company.
For any company, big or small, leaks are a major problem. This could cause major damages to the company or even could lead to the company being closed down. For example, many tech companies make products every year which are kept secret until the release; this is done so that the products generate more buzz when it is launched, which leads to greater sales. However, many products get leaked, thus making people aware of the products leading to less attraction of the product at launch. For companies whose income revolves around secret ideas or recipes, leaks are even more dangerous as it cause it to close down. For instance, KFC would close down if their chicken recipe was revealed. Therefore, by routinely checking mails, leaks could be precluded.
Routinely checking e-mail correspondences of employees leads to better functioning of the company. The employees, being aware that they are being monitored, will try to perform work as efficiently as possible. This might however, lead to the morale of the employees decline. Instead, employees should be made aware that mail correspondence is a part of the job and should be checked.
While employees require a degree of privacy, it is important to keep a check on their mail correspondence to ensure no significant damage to the company in done.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...es, leaks are even more dangerous as it cause it to close down. For instance, KFC wou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 306.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09150326797 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72315380807 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545751633987 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6745592769 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6470588235 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151082840822 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523413941627 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389795423144 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986572135177 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218424518446 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.