Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be

Essay topics:

Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.

Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.

The above prompt is about whether the discussion of contoversial topics with people having opposing views are useful or not. I agree that it is nearly impossible to change people's mind about their core beliefs especially the people who fall under the age category of 50+. This is because, their whole life they were taught that these core beleifs were true and are extremely important for the way the behave. These beliefs indispensible to them and make them who they are today. For example, in Indian culture, it is belived that children are not supposed to talk back to their parents and just follow anything and everything they say, no matter what. And if the child and the parent has a difference of opinion and the child tries to speak up, it is believed that the child is disparaging the parents. And this belief is what causes sundry predicaments in the family.
There is no right or wrong, there are only posits, which are considered to be "right" or "wrong" by a certain group of people. For example, some people may believe that girls should not wear short clothes because some people consider it to be indecent and assume that girls wear such clothes only to seek more attention, which might not be the case actually. And people with such a belief, would never change their mind about such a sensitive issue because they have been brought up like that. They have a jaundiced mindset, which is very difficult to change.
The elder people of our society have a very callous mindset, and are pedantic. For example, Indians, the people who are above the age of 60, they are usually jingoistic and consider athesim as a stigma. The elderly people sure have more experience but they still believe in obsolete practices like the dowry. the elderly cannot be blamed for believeing in such a thing as they themselves might have gone through it. They have had the same belief or mindset for the past 30-40years which cannot be easily broken.
In conclusion, the discussions of controversial and sensitive topics among people with contrasting views and opinions, might help for the other person to understand one's view but it is still nearly impossible to change their minds about their core beliefs.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...and are extremely important for the way the behave. These beliefs indispensible to them an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e in obsolete practices like the dowry. the elderly cannot be blamed for believeing...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, so, still, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85263157895 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55975132968 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1232900942 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.470588235 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290903091953 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923826226296 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102474918649 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199152012912 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994546214872 0.0667264976115 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.