Education is fundamental requirement of a human being. Educational institute plays a crucial role in building the future of their students. I strongly disapprove the idea that educational institutes have a responsibility to dissuade the student from pursuing the field of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
For the very basic reason that no matter how much learned you might be or how much ever experienced you are, it is not impossible that you will not be wrong or you cannot take wrong decisions. So, any educational institute should not have control over the life decisions of the student's life. One of the most fundamental aspect of education is a gradual process called learning. A student can only gain experience from their own mistakes and decide truly where their potential lies. An educational institute can provide with the material and maybe some suggestions regarding whatever they think will be suitable for the student but it is the decision of the student so as to pursue what in their life. In India due to poverty, a lot of people try to do either engineering or medical to earn more and lead a better future life although their true potential doesn't lie in that. Despite that, they do well enough in their respective fields and are able to lead a decent life. Had it been educational institute's decision as to if the student has aptitude for doing engineering or medical then condition in India would have been lot more difficult for people struggling to make their lives better. This in turn proves that a student can do what they want to if they have determined to do so.
This brings my next point. If a student has determined something and is willing to pursue some career then they will put their effort for it and will become better and improve themselves. Hence, previously when students did not have aptitude for some subject might have improved to a decent level in that subject. Hence, strong determination can make a lot of difference. History has many prominent evidences in this. One of those is Micheal Jordan, he was not at all good in basketball in his high school which was very reason why he was thrown out of his highs school basketball team. But, his love and dedication to basketball has now made him a world renowned player in basketball.
Surely, we can see that if educational institute have a saying in guiding students to a field where they are likely to succeed then it will help students to complete their credits in colleges in respective domain and quickly become a member of working class society but this will defy one of the most fundamental principle of education that is learning from experiences and mistakes. This will produce working professional who do not have decisive nature and lack self confidence.
This concludes my stance as to why educational institutes should not be given authority to decide the field of study for the student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... control over the life decisions of the students life. One of the most fundamental aspec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 666, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...t but it is the decision of the student so as to pursue what in their life. In India due...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 856, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ture life although their true potential doesnt lie in that. Despite that, they do well...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, then, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2412.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81437125749 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69494933927 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489021956088 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.7282555947 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7727272727 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.40909090909 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38340316903 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113878358356 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173436958516 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267757465052 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184979082278 0.0667264976115 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.