The statement claims that Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. I strongly disagree the claim, especially the word "dissuade" which means to discourage or demotivate. Educational Institutions should respect the choice of student and may guide them to success.
Firstly, Educational Institutions are established for the welfare of students, they are meant to motivate the students to persuade their dreams. Dissuading students from their interested fields will just add disinterested students to that field of study. Students certainly cant perform as well as they could in their interested fields. Educational Institutions cannot judge the potential of a student better than thyself. As the quote says "If we judge the fish for the ability of it to fly, it spends the whole life feeling stupid". Students must be given complete freedom for selection of their future, Educational Institutions must mentor them rather than dissuading then.
Secondly, We should not always choose the clear path to success. Failure is considered the best teacher, Its by failure-One learns the lessons and proceed in a better direction. Failure just ameliorates the process and failing hasn't stopped people from discoveries and inventions. Some people love to choose the "The road which is less taken" with their passion and explore new things and pursue their dreams. It is a blunder to judge the long-term success of the student by extrapolating his previous performance in the particular chosen field. A student may perform exceptionally well or deteriorate his performance in the future. Performance and success of the student is driven by the passion and interests of the student.
In addition to this, example of Albert Einstein advocates the discussion. Albert Einstein won Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on The Theory of Relativity, One of the greatest minds ever lived. Albert Einstein was bullied by his teachers because he was dull in maths, Einstein was a poor student in studies. His Institution never recognized his abilities and his capabilities. If he was dissuaded from pursuing the physicist career, we would not have the Theory of Relativity and "Energy mass relation", which helped to unfold mysteries and unsolved questions in the world of physics.
Therefore, Educational Institutions should not dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. As Educational Institutions have no right to do so, Student always have the right to choose their own future and destiny.
Hey, Can you please suggest
Hey, Can you please suggest me where can i improve my score?
Need more arguments instead
Need more arguments instead of examples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...that field of study. Students certainly cant perform as well as they could in their ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ust ameliorates the process and failing hasnt stopped people from discoveries and inv...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... inventions. Some people love to choose the The road which is less taken with their pas...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'The' is left.
Suggestion: the; The
... inventions. Some people love to choose the The road which is less taken with their pas...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...us performance in the particular chosen field. A student may perform exceptionally we...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'in addition', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260579064588 0.240241500013 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.164810690423 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0623608017817 0.0880659088768 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0534521158129 0.0497285424764 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0668151447661 0.0444667217837 150% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.113585746102 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0378619153675 0.0406280797675 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93479879503 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0356347438753 0.030933414821 115% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0913140311804 0.0997080785238 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0244988864143 0.0249443105267 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.011135857461 0.0148568991511 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2611.0 2732.02544248 96% => OK
No of words: 411.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.35279805353 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.430656934307 0.366273622748 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.333333333333 0.280924506359 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.240875912409 0.200843997647 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143552311436 0.132149295362 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93479879503 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501216545012 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 55.3980931294 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8695652174 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9857009641 59.4972553346 54% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.52173913 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8695652174 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.521739130435 0.674092028746 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 51.2028985507 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.4453125 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513381073854 0.391690518653 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124692469261 0.123202303941 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0731473748653 0.077325440228 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.530968133443 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124480655737 0.149214159877 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19272973158 0.161403998019 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136778014304 0.0892212321368 153% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.32457131379 0.385218514788 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0888860012222 0.0692045440612 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382410494094 0.275328986314 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131890045121 0.0653680567796 202% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.