Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education is the supreme investment one could make for himself and his future. The world works on educated minds and was built by educated minds so I don’t have to point out that it will always have a place for people and their intellect. However, it should be made clear that not all people are built for the toils that investment banking comes with or the diligence that computer scientists find requisite. Therefore I must admit that the presented suggestion has my full affirmation- with only a twist to a certain point-of-view.
Any student’s education consists of 6 parts, namely, Pre-School, Primary Education, Secondary Education, Under-Graduates, Graduates and Doctorate. While it is very much necessary to complete a minimal necessity course until secondary education to function and survive in this opportunistic world, to be able to carry out mechanical jobs at the least, one often fails to decide whether one should go for higher education. Even if they do decide to pursue higher academics, they should be very pellucid regarding their endeavors.
Higher education implores the student to pursue specialization. While most students are capable of primary education, not all have the ken to compete at a higher-platform. Universities and educational institutions should recognize this and make ways so that such wrong steps are not given much investment. An aptitude test works out really well to filter out the batch of students according to their strengths and skills. Moreover, they could also help the student himself to understand him better and be a more successful person in life than he would be by following trends of the seemingly studious colleagues. Those that would be exceptionally skilled at marketing and salesman-ship would fit quite horribly in an advanced study of looped quantum-gravity and contrarily so, those that are gifted with critical analysis and problem-solving capabilities would be naïve as doctors that require practice more than improvisation.
On the other hand, it may work out well for a person who has genuine interest in a specific field and knows its explored areas, its limitations and the way he could fit in- even if he doesn’t necessarily have the required knowledge to pursue his dreams. Man has always learnt as situations have come up and education can be no different in that way. For example, I used to be a failure at my secondary education but given my propensities towards personal-computing and innovation, today I’m proudly pursuing my dream-field, Natural Language Processing; Did I tell you I have already published 3 papers?
So, in conclusion, one can say that institutions need to filter out the appropriate students for their courses. But! While doing so, they also need to take into account the person’s proclivity and knowledge before considering their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...hat computer scientists find requisite. Therefore I must admit that the presented suggest...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'really', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220077220077 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.164092664093 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0810810810811 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0656370656371 0.0497285424764 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0656370656371 0.0444667217837 148% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0984555984556 0.12292977631 80% => OK
Participles: 0.03861003861 0.0406280797675 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.18297341449 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0328185328185 0.030933414821 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0135135135135 0.0016655270985 811% => OK
Determiners: 0.0675675675676 0.0997080785238 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.030888030888 0.0249443105267 124% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00772200772201 0.0148568991511 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2875.0 2732.02544248 105% => OK
No of words: 457.0 452.878318584 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29102844639 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371991247265 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299781181619 0.280924506359 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.236323851204 0.200843997647 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.175054704595 0.132149295362 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18297341449 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 219.290929204 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564551422319 0.48968727796 115% => OK
Word variations: 68.6284560987 55.4138127331 124% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0526315789 23.380412469 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.9791855884 59.4972553346 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.315789474 141.124799967 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0526315789 23.380412469 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.842105263158 0.674092028746 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 54.0307497409 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.2091503268 1.64882698954 73% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307265670268 0.391690518653 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0922163845712 0.123202303941 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0629570505469 0.077325440228 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.493948347902 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160623619263 0.149214159877 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110761529568 0.161403998019 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537912597879 0.0892212321368 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.23993244301 0.385218514788 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0513173929817 0.0692045440612 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194797018694 0.275328986314 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335599489811 0.0653680567796 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.