Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Educational institutions are the pivotal factor, which define the future of the students. These institutes not only provide knowledge of specific field but open up the mind of the students by providing opportunities in various fields. Students are always in debt of their Alma matter for providing platform for kick starting their career. Speaker contends that educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose the course that will prepare them for lucrative careers. I disagree with author. In my opinion, educational institutions should guide the students in making decision regarding their future, but actively encouraging students to choose the field with lucrative job is little extreme to support.
First, how educational institutions decide which field of study will provide lucrative job is a big question. It is not necessary that the field that currently provides big job with big money will continue to do so. What if after 5 or 10 years, trend in the market change and job market orientation shifts to different direction? So university cannot suggest with surety that jobs in the particular field will provide lucrative compensation for the whole life.
Further, it is crucial that student study in a field in which he or she is interested. Assuming any how students enter in the industry having job with good money at the expense of the interest, they will not be satisfied with the work. They will not be motivated to do any research or any further study in that field, which eventually diminish the efficacy. Suggesting a student who is interesting in painting to study a medicine is two way losses for the society; society will lose good painter and have bad doctor.
On the contrary, one can argue that students are naïve and do not have exposer of the corporate world so that intervention of the institute is important. Agree, institution should intervene, but they should guide student to select the field they are interested and provide resources and opportunities to excel in their respective interested fields. Because excellence in any field will make students to survive in the corporate world in any situations, even after wind of trend in the market changes its direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: BE_INTEREST_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'interested'?
Suggestion: interested
...e efficacy. Suggesting a student who is interesting in painting to study a medicine is two ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'in my opinion', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254452926209 0.238963963785 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.155216284987 0.154291517835 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.089058524173 0.0886310499679 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0381679389313 0.0506014161523 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0432569974555 0.0449626384858 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12213740458 0.123526278965 99% => OK
Participles: 0.030534351145 0.0379742944744 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81105276417 2.82910677849 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0254452926209 0.0316879551592 80% => OK
Particles: 0.00254452926209 0.0014075125626 181% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0916030534351 0.0950106342287 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0356234096692 0.0245489744465 145% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.027989821883 0.0157978311181 177% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2237.0 2899.98275862 77% => OK
No of words: 362.0 478.390804598 76% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17955801105 6.0591788892 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.65681771538 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389502762431 0.369966551584 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309392265193 0.285172536893 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.229281767956 0.207245337619 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149171270718 0.136322040163 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81105276417 2.82910677849 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 234.298850575 78% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502762430939 0.492565540709 102% => OK
Word variations: 53.3709501011 56.8184620615 94% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 21.1264367816 80% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2941176471 23.7468607788 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1910537962 62.0618507366 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.588235294 143.81877709 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 23.7468607788 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.411764705882 0.728815259664 56% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.87931034483 82% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.71264367816 13% => OK
Readability: 52.2333441664 52.2641144681 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.72043010753 1.64547068916 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335430869391 0.39480681544 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111487246952 0.11556216369 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.072544514471 0.0736162880345 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.523215268704 0.531340600358 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127212794407 0.15197228837 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14317871248 0.158818324754 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152277122571 0.0851127212816 179% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.397727442555 0.388921930462 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0440136092487 0.0677916285025 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231024233678 0.28015025965 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133545568407 0.0610219844235 219% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.8591954023 64% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30459770115 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.96264367816 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.10632183908 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.93390804598 102% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.04597701149 66% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 15.0862068966 86% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 3.0 Out of 6