Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
I am a firm believer of the argument that people should chose their field of study according to their interest. They should study what they like rather than what promises a lucrative job. In that sense, I also believe that universities should not dictate students to choose particular fields of study just because of abundance of jobs.
If people pursue only those fields where jobs are plentiful and monetarily rewarding, there would be many jobs which would people would not chose to do because they are not rewarding. If those jobs are contributive to the society, the society will suffer because of the lack of manpower in those areas. Therefore, a university should be able to persuade students to be open minded so that various people would have various occupation and there would not be a paucity of manpower in necessary fields. Now, questions may rise on whether it should be the responsibility of the university to ensure its students get good placement and get a rewarding salary. However, the university also has a responsibility towards the society. Because many students would already choose a lucrative field of study, the ones who are not yet moved by financial gain should not be persuaded to only study financially rewarding subjects as they would be the ones to fill in those vacant positions for those necessary but less lucrative occupations.
Further, there will be many students who attend a university for the sole purpose of gaining knowledge. If the university only promotes specific subjects, those students who are trying to expand their knowledge rather than seeking to get a job will be marginalized. Supporters of the statement above might contend that as majority of the students attend universities to become qualified for a job, job placement should be the primary focus of the university. I disagree with this argument because if broad knowledge is promoted and quality education is provided, students will be able to apply the knowledge in whatever field they work in. In that case, the students seeking jobs will get job placement while the students seeking knowledge too will gain knowledge. By doing so the situation of suppressing a minority for the interest of a majority can be avoided.
At length, universities have responsibility towards the society and towards every student that attends the university. The society requires people to pursue a variety of vocations. In addition, each individual student has different expectations from the university. If a university focuses only on particular fields of study, it cannot do justice to the society and to many of its students. By providing unbiased quality education to all, the university can produce graduates who can excel in whatever they pursue and will also be contributive to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'choose'
Suggestion: choose
... many jobs which would people would not chose to do because they are not rewarding. I...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234817813765 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.165991902834 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0627530364372 0.0880659088768 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0607287449393 0.0497285424764 122% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0323886639676 0.0444667217837 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127530364372 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0364372469636 0.0406280797675 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84792101522 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0364372469636 0.030933414821 118% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.109311740891 0.0997080785238 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0546558704453 0.0249443105267 219% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0222672064777 0.0148568991511 150% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2791.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 457.0 452.878318584 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10722100656 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.391684901532 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.312910284464 0.280924506359 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.229759299781 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.150984682713 0.132149295362 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84792101522 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422319474836 0.48968727796 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.5126046367 55.4138127331 84% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.85 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9467696958 59.4972553346 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.55 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.85 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.45 0.674092028746 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 54.1410284464 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.5390625 1.64882698954 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345483203624 0.391690518653 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108692150476 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0642511255121 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.541212973858 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106393644637 0.149214159877 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140483071602 0.161403998019 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476756311572 0.0892212321368 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.401607399238 0.385218514788 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0644216311605 0.0692045440612 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247274016545 0.275328986314 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176668376366 0.0653680567796 27% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.