Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The author comments that educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. I disagree with the contention and feel that the benefits of going into a field where one is unlikely to succeed is far outweighs that of the limitations.
This analysis is based on how one defines success. One may define success as the job and salary he receives after completing study in that field. Others may think it to be the recognition he gets. But most define success as achieving something in the field that no one has done before. It may result in both fame and money. When one is satisfied with the study and is happy to work on it he will strive to do better. As a result new things may be discovered which may help mankind. Choosing the field of study should be solely the work of the students rather than the institutions. Although the institution's and the parents's opinions play a major role the student should look within himself and try to understand which field of study makes him happy, curious and motivating enough to work his entire life on it.If he finds such a field he should go for it. In this day and age no field is lagging behind. There is scope for success but it may take time. One must be patient and strong enough to brave the ramifications. Only then he will achieve something.
However, those for agreeing with contention may have some views. Fields in which success is hard to find will take more time and luck. Sometimes hard work is not enough to achieve success. One of the major reasons for choosing a field of study is to get a job and provide for the family. The financial condition of the student may not be strong enough to wait for a long time to succeed. If the institutions say that a particular field is a difficult many won't tread on such a rigorous path. Most people want to go for something easy to get.
I feel that it may take time to achieve success in some cases but one should not give up. He should work hard and success will follow him. The financial condition plays an important role in one's life. The government should come into this. They should provide scholarships to students who choose to study in an uncommon field. Moving forward in every field of study for us is necessary. Going into a field that is difficult may be a challenge for some. Some may want to prove themselves and go against the norm. That may be their definition of success.
In a nutshell, the educational institution should not dissuade students to pursue a field in which success is hard to get. If the temple of learning themselves stop the learning in a particular field it would die and become obsolete. So, it is their duty to motivate students to go into the unknown and find the road to success. Only then will the human race transcend past their limitations and achieve new heights.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...work on it he will strive to do better. As a result new things may be discovered w...
^^
Line 3, column 825, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...ng enough to work his entire life on it.If he finds such a field he should go for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, then, i feel, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2382.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55449330784 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49065096744 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42638623327 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7153928437 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.0571428571 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.9428571429 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.08571428571 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344973317321 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905660119671 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164297552538 0.0758088955206 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264961603743 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186095514663 0.0667264976115 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 14.1392134831 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 48.8420337079 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 12.1743820225 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 12.1639044944 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.