Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
Knowledge is wisdom, and in today’s modern world wisdom is available and gathered through a systematic way of approach which is termed as Education system. Education system mainly consists of Educators - who are nothing but the teachers, advisers from our school and university, the academic curriculum, the educational material, evaluation process and of course, the students. There has been observed many debates and questioned has been rose pointing out to the efficiency of the Education system. And one of them is what the author here has mentioned. He criticizes the role of the educators in the modern education system and focuses on the sequence of the teaching of facts, the ideas, trends and its concepts. Even though the author’s statement of teaching the facts after the students have studied about the facts and concepts, seems forthright, failure to understand the intrinsic meaning may easily mislead a person. Before drawing any hasty conclusion, I would like to present my understanding regarding this matter.
‘Roger Lewin’, a British prize winning science writer and author of 20 books, once said “Too often children are given answers to remember than problems to solve”. Certainly, this applies perfectly to the current education process situation, which is not suitable for the progress of human kind. It is commonly observed that children or sophomores are unable to grasp the concepts that are taught in the classrooms. This leading to the publications and use of prescribed books, textbooks, and notes containing ample of facts, important historic date, scientific and mathematical formulae and so on. Students who have no idea about the reasons and derivations of the syllabus opt to mug up. Their only motive for learning becomes passing the academics with good grades. This is nothing but rote learning and leading to having knowledge with a hole.
On the contrary, the students who are well cognitive about the basic ideas, reasons and the overall concepts on the derivations of the subjects, becomes fully equipped to answer any related theory that is out of their academic world – which is again a growing pre requisite of the today’s world. Take for an example, a student who has mastered the structure engineering; she/he would easily be able to solve any kind of trickiest strange question that might be asked in a competitive exam. Moreover, this student during his future career would be able to provide realistic solutions lucidly giving illustrations to others, thereby imparting his/her intellect in a manner that is efficacious. Thus, teaching the concepts, ideas and trends along with the facts would help generate geniuses who can not only grasp the roots of the phenomenon but also in future can deliver it to the world. Besides, the fact that earlier inventors and discoverers did not use definite formulas or theorems to find answers about the universe. They simply applied their ideas, wisdom and intellect, formulated empirical equations and took years of pondering to come up with a finding. And hence, it is necessary to help students to understand the facts with deeper concepts to understand be master in the desired subject.
In conclusion, it is essential that the educators recognize and implement the facts by way of concepts, ideas and trends, so as to create dynamic students. It is universal truth that mere rote learning or incomplete learning would lead to stagnation in that field. Hence, given these reasons, educators should strive to complement education and wisdom by teaching ideas and concepts along with the facts to produce successful students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...n system mainly consists of Educators - who are nothing but the teachers, advisers from...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cademic world – which is again a growing pre requisite of the today's world....
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the trickiest'.
Suggestion: of the trickiest
... would easily be able to solve any kind of trickiest strange question that might be asked in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s by way of concepts, ideas and trends, so as to create dynamic students. It is universa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, kind of, of course, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3072.0 2235.4752809 137% => OK
No of words: 582.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27835051546 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91168771031 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80984528074 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 305.0 215.323595506 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524054982818 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 942.3 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6747961435 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285196529486 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673103687578 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597028722905 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158452887559 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371951575915 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 174.0 100.480337079 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.