The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The effectiveness of a country's leader is always in accordance with the behaviors and moral standards of the citizens. Thus, there is a saying that the effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. While it may be well to premise that this statement points out the very significant aspect to the measure the effectiveness of a leader, I do not want to maintain that the well-being of the citizen is the only measurement for that.
In the first place, I have to admit that the well-being of the country's citizen mirrors the effectiveness of a country’s leader in many aspects. On the one hand, the greater effort the officials make, the higher GDP the countries will be, which will definitely benefit the citizens in the country such as higher salary, more comfortable environment, and more convenient social equipment. On the other hand, the social welfare of common people like health insurance, fundamental education, and retirement pension can be utilized to examine the degree that the country takes the citizen into consideration. Therefore, it is no deniable to say that the industrial contribution that a effective leader made can be best measured by its citizens.
In addition, another factor that contributes to the examination for an effective leader of the country should be given priority to the virtually moral standard of the citizens. In other words, how the leaders strive for the country will absolutely make profound influence on the citizen behaviors. For example, during the Han Dastny of the ancient China, the thoughts and behaviors of an Chinese empire called Liu Heng made an active impact on his people, so that when he was in charge, there was less criminals and people were of kindness. Another example should be the case in the modern China about 1966-1967, the error of the leaders' advocating to produce iron and to stop producing crops has paused the economic development of China. What are worse, people at that time were like living in the hell. Consequently, we can see that the effectiveness of a leader also can be mirrored from the moral standard of the people.
However, by stating that the effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens does not mean that an effective leader is the only source of the happiness and fulfillers of the people. This statement means that utilizing the well-being of citizens to measure the effectiveness of a country's leader does not always hold true by virtue of several different circumstances. One of them is that we cannot blame a new leader for the effect that the former leader has made, which, if did so, will be under no deliberation. Additionally, there is other index for the measurement such as the judgment from the fellow officials, the commentary from the prosecutor office, and the performance in the global stage.
To sum up, while the effectiveness of a country's leader can be definitely measured by his/her citizens from both economic and moral aspects, there is no exaggeration to say that this statement does not always hold true because there are several different conditions. In addition, there is always some other index for the measurement of the effectiveness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 628, Rule ID: IT_IS_NO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not' or 'now'?
Suggestion: not; now
...en into consideration. Therefore, it is no deniable to say that the industrial con...
^^
Line 4, column 685, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y that the industrial contribution that a effective leader made can be best measu...
^
Line 6, column 386, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...nt China, the thoughts and behaviors of an Chinese empire called Liu Heng made an ...
^^
Line 6, column 498, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun criminals is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...o that when he was in charge, there was less criminals and people were of kindness. ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 394, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
... does not always hold true by virtue of several different circumstances. One of them is that we c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 238, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
... not always hold true because there are several different conditions. In addition, there is alway...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, in other words, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2753.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 544.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06066176471 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94829503891 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 868.5 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3852989622 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.894736842 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6315789474 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63157894737 5.21951772744 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350299737467 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134784633904 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950972990106 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231141694911 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876796958627 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.