The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Leaders' strategies especially their programs can essentially affect people’s lives. Therefore, in my opinion, evaluating of residents' life condition is a good way to measure the efficacy of countries' leaders for the following reasons.
First, for a country with effective leaders, people have more healthful lives. The health condition of a country's residents can directly affected by its leaders’ programs. For example, passing a law in congress that teach people about the harmful effects of high fat foods or that limit the number of stores which sell fast foods results in lower number of fat people in a country. Therefore, the decisions of health leaders in a country could prevent many diseases like obesity.
Also, effective leaders in a country can plan such that people have a better life from an economic point of view. Economic condition of a country's citizens can be one of the best factors to measure the usefulness of leaders’ programs. Consider how a good leader can plan so that all children especially the poor ones being able to study in school. The number of children which give up education because of their family poor economic condition can be increased by an ineffective program performed by economic leaders in a country.
In contrast, there are some aspects like religious that leaders do not have much effect on residents in. Since, almost in any country, religious readers can just advise people about following a religion, their effect on people’s well-being is limited. Therefore, the citizens’ condition in such aspects cannot be the best measure of leaders’ effectiveness. For instance, many people in a Muslim country can be Christian even though there are really good leaders in Islam religion on that country.
In sum, assessing well-being condition of people is a good but not the best way to measure leaders' effectiveness because the leaders' effects on people can vary from one area to others completely.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25867507886 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90559054037 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485804416404 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4745803529 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.133333333 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389417175728 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161374567798 0.0831039109588 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099065038919 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251132432958 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547214048735 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.