Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
The issue that whether formal education tries not to set our mind and spirit free rather to limit them is a contentious one. While each side has strengths and weaknesses but I agree with the topic. Because normally students never learn anything out of the syllabus plus, they hardly get any chance to look for anything out of syllabus due to its huge volume. In addition, basing on those formal results the higher field of study is determined so parents also discourage their kids to study anything out of syllabus.
Students are always reluctant in gathering knowledge that does not come in the exam. They keep revising the same topic for the excellence in the exam, even few of them memorize the topic with understanding just to obtain more marks. This is very dangerous, it not only restricts our mind and spirit but also deject our heart to learn more. Hence, formal education restrain our mind and spirit.
Secondly, now a days the syllabus for the students are so huge that they hardly get any chance to glance outside of those listed topic. And most of these topics are superficial, they never go deep into the topic. Moreover, this education system doesn’t even allow students learn extensively because they are too busy in completing the syllabus.
Thirdly, public exams are held basing on these syllabus, whose results give the recognition- which field, he will continue his higher education. Like, the top scorers will be selected for engineering which will be followed by doctor and other professions. So, basically parents discourage their children to study anything out of the syllabus because that’s not going to help them in getting selected for engineering or medical science. That’s why formal education with limited syllabus limits student’s mind & spirit.
On the contrary, some may argue that, limited syllabus is good enough to explore student’s knowledge which is flowed. Because free thinking never comes being confined within the list of topics. As like, Newton, S.Hawking they all were free thinker and never restricted themselves within the listed topics. Hence, selected knowledge as per syllabus never allows our mind to explore freely.
In conclusion, formal education never allows us to explore anything without syllabus due to its volume moreover, parents also doesn’t allow their children to waste time in learning something which will not help them in score better in public exams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...train our mind and spirit. Secondly, now a days the syllabus for the students are so hu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...n our mind and spirit. Secondly, now a days the syllabus for the students are so hu...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this syllabus' or 'these syllabi', 'these syllabuses'?
Suggestion: this syllabus; these syllabi; these syllabuses
...hirdly, public exams are held basing on these syllabus, whose results give the recognition wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...abus, whose results give the recognition which field, he will continue his higher...
^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re student’s knowledge which is flowed. Because free thinking never comes being confine...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hawking
... the list of topics. As like, Newton, S.Hawking they all were free thinker and never re...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217391304348 0.238963963785 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.173913043478 0.154291517835 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0823798627002 0.0886310499679 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0869565217391 0.0506014161523 172% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0594965675057 0.0449626384858 132% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12356979405 0.123526278965 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0503432494279 0.0379742944744 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49532044317 2.82910677849 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0343249427918 0.0316879551592 108% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0014075125626 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0732265446224 0.0950106342287 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0114416475973 0.0245489744465 47% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0160183066362 0.0157978311181 101% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2440.0 2899.98275862 84% => OK
No of words: 397.0 478.390804598 83% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14609571788 6.0591788892 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.65681771538 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385390428212 0.369966551584 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277078085642 0.285172536893 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.2040302267 0.207245337619 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115869017632 0.136322040163 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49532044317 2.82910677849 88% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 234.298850575 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51637279597 0.492565540709 105% => OK
Word variations: 57.1174753596 56.8184620615 101% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 21.1264367816 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.85 23.7468607788 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1949941918 62.0618507366 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 143.81877709 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.85 23.7468607788 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.728815259664 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.87931034483 123% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.71264367816 78% => OK
Readability: 47.5578085642 52.2641144681 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.22142857143 1.64547068916 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201583289213 0.39480681544 51% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119957697917 0.11556216369 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0843121999795 0.0736162880345 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.522301903663 0.531340600358 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15184963435 0.15197228837 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842764325678 0.158818324754 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950013113424 0.0851127212816 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.244518757141 0.388921930462 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0851607945783 0.0677916285025 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122952015579 0.28015025965 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052455603716 0.0610219844235 86% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.8591954023 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30459770115 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.96264367816 40% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.10632183908 74% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.93390804598 153% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.04597701149 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 15.0862068966 80% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 4.0 Out of 6