Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The recommendation that Government focus should be on solving immediate problems rather than the anticipated problems of the future is not prudent. The recommendation doesn't considers the implication of ignoring upcoming future problems. These problems if ignored, may lead to repercussion later.
To begin with, consider the burning issue of Global warming. This issue if, is not addressed right now, and if no proactive steps are taken right now, then many cities of the world will be inundated and will be destroyed completely. It requires government to take steps to prevent the causes that leads to Global Warming in order to prevent its catastrophic consequences. Also, the hot issues like conservation of natural resources like petrol, coal etc. are if not considered right now, then, our future generations will be completely devoid of these resources and we will be in the danger of going back to the old stone age. Thus, Government must bring up such issues of future, should develop strategies for coping with them.
Furthermore, some anticipated future problems require some planning beforehand. For instance, consider, a city surrounded by the river from every side. The water level of this river is rising day by day because the nearby glaciers are melting because of Global warming or increasing temperature. If, Government ignore this problem thinking that it's not pertinent to thing about it right now, then, in future if suddenly water level reaches an alarming level then city will be in peril. At that stage, it may also be difficult for the Government to take steps to come out of the situation and thus, not taking into the account this problem earlier, will prove deleterious for everyone.
Also, taking into consideration the future problem in no way imply to completely ignore the current problems. Instead, Government should at least once analyze which problem needs immediate action and then should go about it. In the meantime, they should also devise strategies for the anticipated problems of the future and should start action on them, so that life of people is always safe.
To sum up, a careful analysis of all the problems should be done. This will help Government to decide that what all problems are important to be addressed. If, government simply ignores future problem and solve only the current ones, then the time when Future problems will come, they will give Government no time to act and can bring cataclysm. Hence, future problems must not be ignored. They should also be looked upon and a proper plan for them should be ready, so that if they occur we know how to tackle them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ture is not prudent. The recommendation doesnt considers the implication of ignoring u...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'ignores'.
Suggestion: ignores
... increasing temperature. If, Government ignore this problem thinking that its not pert...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'at least', 'for instance', 'to begin with', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217213114754 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.157786885246 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0717213114754 0.0880659088768 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0799180327869 0.0497285424764 161% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0348360655738 0.0444667217837 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120901639344 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0430327868852 0.0406280797675 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64877475474 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0327868852459 0.030933414821 106% => OK
Particles: 0.00409836065574 0.0016655270985 246% => OK
Determiners: 0.0922131147541 0.0997080785238 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.047131147541 0.0249443105267 189% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0122950819672 0.0148568991511 83% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2630.0 2732.02544248 96% => OK
No of words: 436.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03211009174 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360091743119 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.240825688073 0.280924506359 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18119266055 0.200843997647 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123853211009 0.132149295362 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64877475474 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493119266055 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 55.2285220219 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8181818182 23.380412469 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.102863523 59.4972553346 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.545454545 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 23.380412469 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.590909090909 0.674092028746 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 43.9007506255 51.4728631049 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.3984962406 1.64882698954 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471954926577 0.391690518653 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105719162433 0.123202303941 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0793420603908 0.077325440228 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.490631585259 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156184504331 0.149214159877 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183714433978 0.161403998019 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123338323334 0.0892212321368 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.362297521408 0.385218514788 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0572258762424 0.0692045440612 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353776035964 0.275328986314 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10971493482 0.0653680567796 168% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.30420353982 264% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 12.0 3.66592920354 327% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.