Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
The statement clearly explains the opposition of funding to the scientific research & work, without knowing the results of it. It can be taken into account that a scientific research requires lot of money to complete and sometimes, results are not upto the expected extent. There are many fields i.e; Infrastructure development, Defence funding, Public sectors etc that require funding for the their improvisation. It will directly provide result to the public. But, Scientific research also holds same importance that any other fields. Research is done without any certainty of its actual end result and it may end up with disaster but it also gives the advancement in technology, solution to the medical field, upgrade to the living of human being.
To bolster my point, there are few examples which will help to clear my view. The scientific research mostly results the advantage for many of the fields and provides an optimistic way to cut the cost. When we look its future perspective, it will always end up cost reduction. The advancement in medical field due to research has always provided ample amount of aids to the people of world. There was a time in the world, when people were dying due to malaria. The research team has solved the enigma of many of these dangerous disease provided significant results. The military field has also seen the advancement of weapon which is a result of these scientific results and overall defence field gets stronger day by day.
Another reason of my view is the increment in the technology part by the research. We are in the new era of technology now and when we look into the past, some researches was looked impossible to think. From the transportation to telecom sector, from the microbiology to space research or the aviation sector to daily life things, from the giant google search engine to the new augment reality tool, we have seen the many fruitful results which have provided the certainty of human life on earth. It has always provided the the solution to ease the human life.
To tender my opinion on the given issue, I think that any scientific research has always answered the opaque doubts by, either it provided the expected results or helped us to learn about the doubts of any field. The research of any field has always been an important part for their improvisation. Some critics may put up questions against the big funding to the researches which end up with no result but we should always bear it that these researches are started to serve the humanity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...f it. It can be taken into account that a scientific research requires lot of money to complete and s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ic sectors etc that require funding for the their improvisation. It will directly provide...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 521, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...n life on earth. It has always provided the the solution to ease the human life. To ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 521, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...n life on earth. It has always provided the the solution to ease the human life. To ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'i think']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262260127932 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.149253731343 0.157235817809 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0810234541578 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0319829424307 0.0497285424764 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0511727078891 0.0444667217837 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100213219616 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0341151385928 0.0406280797675 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61582575247 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.044776119403 0.030933414821 145% => OK
Particles: 0.00852878464819 0.0016655270985 512% => OK
Determiners: 0.130063965885 0.0997080785238 130% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0149253731343 0.0249443105267 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0149253731343 0.0148568991511 100% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2536.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 432.0 452.878318584 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87037037037 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361111111111 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256944444444 0.280924506359 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.168981481481 0.200843997647 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0902777777778 0.132149295362 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61582575247 2.79330140395 94% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 219.290929204 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490740740741 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.7114226063 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6 23.380412469 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.895217382 59.4972553346 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.8 141.124799967 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 23.380412469 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.35 0.674092028746 52% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 47.2944444444 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.70642201835 1.64882698954 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0858930032122 0.391690518653 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.135141660699 0.123202303941 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0982053304395 0.077325440228 127% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.548266795335 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175520435159 0.149214159877 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466414673307 0.161403998019 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431442992539 0.0892212321368 48% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.558768634223 0.385218514788 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0208907660251 0.0692045440612 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752295237492 0.275328986314 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384703471371 0.0653680567796 59% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.