Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
The issue presents the view that the governments should provide free education at the university level to students who are qualified to pursue the curriculum at a university, but aren't able to afford the costs involved due to a variety of reasons. This policy would certainly help bright students who aren't related to adults who can underwrite the costs involved and is a great investment tool in the students of a country with a potential to contribute back to the economy. The policy has the potential to raise the bar at the university level by making a lot more student eligible for higher education and can also act as an alternative implementation to some of the benefits provided under the current caste based reservation system.
First, the rising student loans are an indicator that there is a pool containing a substantial number of students who can't afford the university education and are forced to take out a loan to fund the expenses. This policy is certain to ease a good percentage of the burden by choosing the right students who qualify for the university aid from the government. Also, the policy would help people who aren't eligible for an education loan in the first place by allowing them to advance their learning in their areas of interest by pursuing education at the university level.
Second, the policy can be analysed from an investment perspective assuming that a higher number of students would transform into high quality researchers in different fields. This indirectly affects the economy by increasing the number of participants in the research community.
Third, the policy can be thought of as an alternative implementation of the extant benefits provided in certain countries under the caste based reservation systems. Instead of blindly providing benefits to students belonging to a certain ethnic group, the policy will pave the way for a level playing field where all performing students are eligible for free education.
As with any policy, it is possible that certain students might abuse the system and cheat their way to enjoy free education by faking their family financial status. However, this problem is only posed by a small percentage of students and can be tackled by implementing strict background verification before extending financial aid. Once the system to verify the financial credentials is in place, the policy is well positioned to bring sizeable returns on investment over time.
To conclude, the free education policy can definitely help economically underprivileged students, provide undifferentiated access to financial aid to students of all castes and boost the economic status of a country by producing a higher number of qualified researchers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...sue the curriculum at a university, but arent able to afford the costs involved due t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ould certainly help bright students who arent related to adults who can underwrite th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 658, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...act as an alternative implementation to some of the benefits provided under the current cas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ng a substantial number of students who cant afford the university education and are...
^^^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... Also, the policy would help people who arent eligible for an education loan in the f...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'in the first place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.273706896552 0.240241500013 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.157327586207 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0926724137931 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0280172413793 0.0497285424764 56% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0129310344828 0.0444667217837 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.127155172414 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0581896551724 0.0406280797675 143% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94141226681 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0452586206897 0.030933414821 146% => OK
Particles: 0.00215517241379 0.0016655270985 129% => OK
Determiners: 0.148706896552 0.0997080785238 149% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0258620689655 0.0249443105267 104% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150862068966 0.0148568991511 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2723.0 2732.02544248 100% => OK
No of words: 439.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20273348519 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.410022779043 0.366273622748 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30979498861 0.280924506359 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.24145785877 0.200843997647 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.157175398633 0.132149295362 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94141226681 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478359908884 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 53.1897674232 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 31.3571428571 23.380412469 134% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5583351445 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.5 141.124799967 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3571428571 23.380412469 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.674092028746 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 62.3366417182 51.4728631049 121% => OK
Elegance: 2.3152173913 1.64882698954 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329606779848 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.157443045125 0.123202303941 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0577352272694 0.077325440228 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.724564836378 0.547984918172 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.111758396746 0.149214159877 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160380356102 0.161403998019 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106851932359 0.0892212321368 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.397472757016 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.141057134245 0.0692045440612 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195320160891 0.275328986314 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117910294706 0.0653680567796 180% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.