Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Restriction is what slowers the pace of anything, hence restrictions will hamper researchers leading demotivation among the researchers. Researches always lead to new innovations, and since it is new, no authority can possibly know ahead of time what could be the result of the research, therefore does not qualify to impose any restriction on researches.
First of all, restriction are nothing but barrios, which basically hampers the progress and on the other hand researchers are free thinkers and wants to live a life of no restrictions even in their professional life, as this provides them the opportunity to come up with new innovative ideas. So restriction on the scientific research and development will tend to demotivate researchers, causing reduced productivity.
If we consider the nuclear power, no doubt they are developed after deliberate research and has led to creation of nuclear warheads affecting a huge number of people during the wars but, that is just one instance where the new idea was utilized in a wrong way, today nuclear power plants working on the likely similar process is powering most of the nation. So if the authority would have banned the research at its grass root level, the most valuable fuel would have been completely depleted by today. Therefore instead of restricting research, its use can be restricted to minimise possible risk.
Finally, since none, other than the researcher, can foretell what the research can finally create, restricting on some hypothetical research is meaningless and even not effective. For example, if a restriction are laid on the production of effective guns and ammunitions, but even then someone may come up with a completely different product, may be accidently (say something similar to grenade) that is more effective than the previously used versions. Research normally plays around thing which are not at all known previously and hence the products can be impressive as well as unpredictable.
Therefore, being a researcher, what I believe is that there should not be any restriction for scientific research and development, as new innovations are required to keep up with the ever-growing world, and the restriction might hamper the pace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...ions, and since it is new, no authority can possibly know ahead of time what could be the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...es them the opportunity to come up with new innovative ideas. So restriction on the scientific...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nstance where the new idea was utilized in a wrong way, today nuclear power plants working on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had banned'?
Suggestion: had banned
...most of the nation. So if the authority would have banned the research at its grass root level, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'no doubt', 'as well as', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221079691517 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.172236503856 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0848329048843 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0771208226221 0.0497285424764 155% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0205655526992 0.0444667217837 46% => OK
Prepositions: 0.105398457584 0.12292977631 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0514138817481 0.0406280797675 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04886025467 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0231362467866 0.030933414821 75% => OK
Particles: 0.00771208226221 0.0016655270985 463% => OK
Determiners: 0.105398457584 0.0997080785238 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0359897172237 0.0249443105267 144% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0179948586118 0.0148568991511 121% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2229.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 354.0 452.878318584 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.29661016949 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367231638418 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.316384180791 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.257062146893 0.200843997647 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.175141242938 0.132149295362 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04886025467 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584745762712 0.48968727796 119% => OK
Word variations: 67.0924831952 55.4138127331 121% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 32.1818181818 23.380412469 138% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.0481598157 59.4972553346 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 202.636363636 141.124799967 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1818181818 23.380412469 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 0.674092028746 202% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 63.8202362609 51.4728631049 124% => OK
Elegance: 1.4 1.64882698954 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323846188821 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123377249746 0.123202303941 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0381103839106 0.077325440228 49% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.662785163442 0.547984918172 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.188050762635 0.149214159877 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155536744888 0.161403998019 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566470038422 0.0892212321368 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.323115503766 0.385218514788 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0230634908275 0.0692045440612 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222547939849 0.275328986314 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378110156808 0.0653680567796 58% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 13.5995575221 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.