Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Scientific research and development is working for future advancements that will benefit us all. Some are facilitated and under the supervision of the Government while others are facilitated by private companies. Although it is a work in benefit of the majority, the Government should have some restrictions with all these scientific research and development because the Government has a responsibility to protect its people, environment and its country from whatever possible things or situation that can harm its people and the country.
A lot of us have benefited from the scientific research and development that have been performed in the past, the best example of this are the medicines and vaccines that we have right now in treating diseases and illnesses that are not curable before like tuberculosis, bacterial infections and many others, without the discoveries and science advancement, we were not be able to cure these and can lead to plague and can result in human extinction. Although we owe a lot in scientific research and development, we should also keep in mind that there should be some restrictions in doing so to protect us human and our environment from possible misuse or abuse of our environment and resources. One example is the use of environmental resources, if we don’t put limit on how many trees they can cut or how many insects or animals they can use on research, it can cause a more serious problem in the future as all these things are important in maintaining the homeostasis in our environment. Lost of too much trees can cause flooding during heavy rains which can also cause death to a lot of people like what happened in the Philippines, because of their environmental abuse, they are now facing bigger problems on flood that have killed thousand of people.
Some may argue that having restrictions or control with the scientific research and development may hinder it to come up with more discoveries and development, but developing a restriction does not mean not allowing them to use resources, restrictions can be done by setting limit, by doing so the person who is performing the research will be cautious and not be wasteful with the use of the resources knowing that it is not unlimited.
Scientific research and development is beneficial to many of us but the Government should have some restrictions to protect us and our environment for possible misuse and abuse of its resources that is also in our benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...es and science advancement, we were not be able to cure these and can lead to plag...
^^
Line 3, column 1010, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ostasis in our environment. Lost of too much trees can cause flooding during heavy r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1244, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...gger problems on flood that have killed thousand of people. Some may argue that havin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... killed thousand of people. Some may argue that having restrictions or control wit...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221461187215 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0707762557078 0.0880659088768 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0365296803653 0.0497285424764 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0639269406393 0.0444667217837 144% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.130136986301 0.12292977631 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0479452054795 0.0406280797675 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01575791338 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0205479452055 0.030933414821 66% => OK
Particles: 0.00228310502283 0.0016655270985 137% => OK
Determiners: 0.0890410958904 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0388127853881 0.0249443105267 156% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0251141552511 0.0148568991511 169% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2470.0 2732.02544248 90% => OK
No of words: 411.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0097323601 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.338199513382 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277372262774 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216545012165 0.200843997647 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155717761557 0.132149295362 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01575791338 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440389294404 0.48968727796 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.1150202931 55.4138127331 85% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6194690265 44% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 45.6666666667 23.380412469 195% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 116.011600101 59.4972553346 195% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 274.444444444 141.124799967 194% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.6666666667 23.380412469 195% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 73.403892944 51.4728631049 143% => OK
Elegance: 1.49572649573 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213514468617 0.391690518653 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.195791709526 0.123202303941 159% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10020742191 0.077325440228 130% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.690497919504 0.547984918172 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.207225371313 0.149214159877 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127364072085 0.161403998019 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671083730381 0.0892212321368 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.369463861582 0.385218514788 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0758940819802 0.0692045440612 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171246155488 0.275328986314 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207433451109 0.0653680567796 32% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 7.0 13.5995575221 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.