Machines are tools developed by human using technology, and technology is the application of scientific knowledge. Machines are developed by humans to complete and solve their regular quandaries efficiently in less time. I partially agree with the statement that human minds will be superior to machines.
In many aspects today, machine have already surpassed humans, the computation, processing and storing of trillion gigabytes of information. Technology has already advanced to such an extent that artificially intelligent machine has been developed, which have surpassed humans. For instance, supercomputer Deep Blue defeated Gary Kasparov, the reigning champion of chess, a game which requires calculation of millions of move. Another example, Deep Mind, artificially intelligent machine, defeated South Korean champion Lee Sedol in a game of go, a very complex game.
However, machines do not have the ability to process information emotionally. The have a logical and rational point of view which will always keep them one step behind of humans. It is only in terms of efficiency and speed that humans lack behind a machine. Places, where emotional touch is required machine, will never surpass humans.
In conclusion, In terms of efficiency and computation speed machines have already surpassed humans, however, machine do not have the ability of making judgement where all the factors including emotion are required.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... intelligent machine has been developed, which have surpassed humans. For instanc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 216.0 442.535393258 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64351851852 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.55969084622 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92999233954 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8336909855 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.583333333 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222358478187 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906823196671 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711529757378 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13920852204 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808337249188 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.