If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more
experience.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and
explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should
consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous
and explain how these examples shape your position.
The competition grows healthier as the population and the “itch” to learn more ameliorates. Jobs requires an individual’s educations as the qualifying stage, followed by interview where they face general questions. The expertise in that field come to know –How exactly they would react to practical life based questions asked spontaneously. Now, this creates a spark in one’s mind, where the experienced one would slightly answer much quicker than the sophomore with equal degrees. I would certainly agree with this statement made but not to extreme.
According to the research of HRD at 3M, USA- the experienced scientists creates the output in short time than the younger minds. They have hands onto the existing project, so the pace is remarkable.
With the sudden crisis in industries and economy, the individuals constituting the organisation should react spontaneously to first push the condition intelligibly at a safer stage. Definitely, one who had undergone such an experience would be smart enough to respond to a similar situation much quickly.
Implementing theoretical knowledge into practical one is the sole aim of all workforce. Being quick at it, would definitely be a boon to ace at it. This could even play when the situation is off the field, most probably an interdisciplinary, understanding and controlling lions at dangerous out-break of them at zoo or sanctuaries- doesn’t require qualifications at that instance but practice. Non-academics at school or college similarly work in nurturing to act during adulthood. Internships made necessary at industries for technical students fosters them to understand the current scenario of industries or companies. As the tender brains are smart enough to perceive things and find solution. Experimenting things at earlier age would guide them in their future while taking up the jobs. Indirectly, Jobs should be offered to those with more experience.
But ultimately, its not restricted to it, an avarice develops in one’s mind to get unscrupulous experiences to dump into their resumes. Yes, it is practiced among students- the quality is deteriorating. The student with good qualifications and a proper understanding would reach apex if a chance is given to him, like the short term training- helping to understand both type of nominees. Here, recommendations work inarguably, ensuring the applicant’s honesty and sincerity.
The applicant who has experienced life’s all pathways efficiently not for the sake of resumes should be selected over others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing project, so the pace is remarkable. With the sudden crisis in industries and...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'while', 'in short']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232018561485 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.146171693735 0.157235817809 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0904872389791 0.0880659088768 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0626450116009 0.0497285424764 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0348027842227 0.0444667217837 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111368909513 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0417633410673 0.0406280797675 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.25114815685 2.79330140395 116% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0417633410673 0.030933414821 135% => OK
Particles: 0.00232018561485 0.0016655270985 139% => OK
Determiners: 0.111368909513 0.0997080785238 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0255220417633 0.0249443105267 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0116009280742 0.0148568991511 78% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2554.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 392.0 452.878318584 87% => OK
Chars per words: 6.51530612245 6.0361032391 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385204081633 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.323979591837 0.280924506359 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.265306122449 0.200843997647 132% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.211734693878 0.132149295362 160% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25114815685 2.79330140395 116% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 219.290929204 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.48968727796 129% => OK
Word variations: 80.8287131725 55.4138127331 146% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8181818182 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7693643253 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.090909091 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.318181818182 0.674092028746 47% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 50.2161410019 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.58095238095 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413396441079 0.391690518653 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0701644311834 0.123202303941 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0338163486926 0.077325440228 44% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.497704073099 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.186073051157 0.149214159877 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148864430399 0.161403998019 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804324105582 0.0892212321368 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.299476063054 0.385218514788 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0829359098529 0.0692045440612 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271608400543 0.275328986314 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413706907225 0.0653680567796 63% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.