"Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time."
This is usually the case, but a statement, if presented correctly with the right proofs and results may be accepted with whole herted regard by the society. However, more often than not, according to the humane nature, one is bound to get rigid, once a thought is set. The beleifs of a person are diifficult to break. Someone brings an idea which can be true but contradicts one's dogmas; much opposition is bound to occur. It is really an inevitabe truth.
As in the old days Copernicus was faced with outright blasts of rage and fear when he had proposed his theory to the world. It was beleived, for a long-time, that the sun revolved around the earth. The Church was very rigid about it and wasn't in any position to accept any other theory, thinking that it will make the people loose faith. Around that time Copernicus, came out with a theory that it was the other way round. He performed experiments, verified it with results and tried to convince people what was true. The result was that he was banished by the church and was forced to live as an outcast. No one was ready to accept this and he was even humiliated. Though Copernicus had asserted the fact but Gallileo was the one who made people accept the fact.
A similar kind of incidence had ocuured when it was proposed the earth was round. People had always hypothesised that the earth was flat regardless of having any proof. It was always assumed that if you kept moving in one direction you would reach the edge of the earth where you would fall off. This particular idea was also faced with anger from the masses. A guy litreally had to travel the world to reach the same point to make people accept the fact that the earth was round.
In most cases people are afraid to accept the contrary fact, and they just beleive what their instinct tells them, and not exploring the other side. The practice of Sati, in ancient India was also like one of these. If a lady's husband died, then the lady was forced to sit in a holy fire and die. This was a practice which was followed blindly, irrespective of the consequences. They were enforced by the so called "erudite gurus" who initiated the practice. To abolish this practice, it took a lot of time and effort.
The fact is that the beleifs and dogmas are necessary for a persons faith and motivation to sustain. Some beleifs even help to give people hope for their well being. Nevertheless, a person should always remain open-minded and should readily, with apposite proofs accept the contrary too. I would like end it by effectively quoting Calvin Coodge (30th U.S. President) "The world is full of educated derelicts".
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the humane nature, one is bound to get rigid, once a thought is set. The beleif...
^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... idea which can be true but contradicts ones dogmas; much opposition is bound to occ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... The Church was very rigid about it and wasnt in any position to accept any other the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... beleifs and dogmas are necessary for a persons faith and motivation to sustain. Some b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... person should always remain open-minded and should readily, with apposite proofs...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, then, well, as for, kind of, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62711864407 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45910242101 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521186440678 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5125434227 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46428571429 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0807918160704 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257070852395 0.0831039109588 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038812792861 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528665179794 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318206875596 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.