The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Let's presume that the rapid pace in the statement denotes the technological advancements that happens everyday in the world. Here, the statement suggests that this increase in pace causes more problems that it solves. However, this can be interpreted as the change in advancements has also some benefits but the issues caused by it higher than it.
Though the statement may be true, it can be proved to be false under various circumstances. From the stone age till the current technological improvements, many conundrum has been solved. Few examples are: Firstly, before the introduction of computer, people suffered to maintain lot of paper works and avoid human calculation mistakes. But now, with the computer lot of hindrances in processing a data and storing has been significantly reduced.
Secondly, proliferation of medical advancements is highly appreciable. By the availability of internet, people are provided with their needs at their door step. An enormous number of forums are available with many doctors involved to discuss about the recent developments, and very basic details like first-aid processes. In addition, as an attempt of reducing the wastage of a material on day-to-day, recently super-slippery surface has been introduced which reduces the commonplace problems like the toothpastes that stick to its surface at the end of its use. This is achieved by reducing their surface tension which results in non-sticky surface of the substance.
Inspite of these developments, some problems are caused due the advancements. Includes the people dependent on motor vehicles when they could avail public transport. While the adaption to private vehicles increases, it leads to traffic and practices the people to a more sophisticated life to the extant, when it is made unavailable people would find it difficult. Social networks despite their benefits holds many disadvantages like spreading fake news and engaging people for quiet long time.
As a whole, the ratio of number of problems solved to the number of problems caused to technological advancement is high than the reverse ratio. The advancements are dependent on the people based on many factors like how often they rely on it, how it is proved useful to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
Lets presume that the rapid pace in the stat...
^^^^
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...technological advancements that happens everyday in the world. Here, the statement sug...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat happens everyday in the world. Here, the statement suggests that this increa...
^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ryday in the world. Here, the statement suggests that this increase in pace caus...
^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun conundrum seems to be countable; consider using: 'many conundrums'.
Suggestion: many conundrums
...the current technological improvements, many conundrum has been solved. Few examples are: Firs...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35211267606 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0210266243 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566197183099 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4706507231 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130986981667 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415141339671 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527719528589 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717470203671 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050988831566 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.