It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
There is a significan’t importance in the feedback we get from society, and it has been known since the ancient times that human beings are “social” creatures. However, to say the way we define ourself is mostly done from our interactions with social group is to go a little bit too far. The way we define ourselves is so complex that any claim about it should be careful and not absolut.
First, I would like to make evreything as simple as it can but simpler as Albert Einstein portraited a successful scientifc endeavor. Unfortunatly, our self image is a controversial subject, and was so always and even more after Zigmund Freud came up with his revoulotanry theory of psycho-analysis. It is still unknown today how we define ourselves and what the ingredients that take place in such a process. Sure, we are social, from our social interactions that occure regularly, we learn, and develop. Nevertheless, there is no proof that those social interactions are the primary shaper of our identity.
Additionaly, there is on going philosophical debate about what is real. How can one be assured that things external to him or her even exist? the external world is always suspicious of being imaginary and unreal. In that since, it is debatable wether or not such an external factor even have any influence at all. If it does not exist in reality, from the pure logical perspective it does not exist at all and therefore cannot be the main arena for the process of self defintion.
Finally, there is a notion of vauge language that is going on that prevents from the original statement the possibilty of being accurate and lucid. It is not clear what is meant by “identification with social group”. It is unclear which social group are this process is aiming to point for. Social group can be anywhare from two individuals to millions and even billions of people.
To conclude, even though the claim is going too far there is an interaction between social environment and the individual. There is an old Cheinese proverb that raise a similiar point about a falling tree in a middle of forest with no withnesses. But, to go for one sided answer on such an arcane issue would not be an anlytical discerining step. There should be some progress in science before we can take such statements with a sound ground below us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...teractions with social group is to go a little bit too far. The way we define ourselves is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...eything as simple as it can but simpler as Albert Einstein portraited a successful...
^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... our identity. Additionaly, there is on going philosophical debate about what is real...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ings external to him or her even exist? the external world is always suspicious of ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'still', 'therefore']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.18818380744 0.240241500013 78% => OK
Verbs: 0.161925601751 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107221006565 0.0880659088768 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0612691466083 0.0497285424764 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0612691466083 0.0444667217837 138% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.109409190372 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0284463894967 0.0406280797675 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96803445947 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0175054704595 0.030933414821 57% => OK
Particles: 0.00218818380744 0.0016655270985 131% => OK
Determiners: 0.0875273522976 0.0997080785238 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.019693654267 0.0249443105267 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0240700218818 0.0148568991511 162% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2353.0 2732.02544248 86% => OK
No of words: 403.0 452.878318584 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83870967742 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317617866005 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.2158808933 0.280924506359 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166253101737 0.200843997647 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.109181141439 0.132149295362 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96803445947 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 219.290929204 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54094292804 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 61.519754033 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.1904761905 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5209321086 59.4972553346 53% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.047619048 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1904761905 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.428571428571 0.674092028746 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 40.7785655205 51.4728631049 79% => OK
Elegance: 1.14615384615 1.64882698954 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348134512561 0.391690518653 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0990017491542 0.123202303941 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0645814687137 0.077325440228 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.478828474633 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0931014805276 0.149214159877 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123281736026 0.161403998019 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602845902701 0.0892212321368 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.310640220053 0.385218514788 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0521501689595 0.0692045440612 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23077750142 0.275328986314 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036747563431 0.0653680567796 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 13.5995575221 44% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.