Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporti

Essay topics:

Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Experiences makes a person more matured and more knowledagble. In difficult times people should look in to the past or ansewrs to find answers to problems.
In any era, People want to achieve success, remain healthy, reach financial stability and help others. As this is the era of enterpreneurs, who wants to work for their own success and developement of the society. Enterpreneurs can learn a lot about how to build new business and sustain that business by looking into history books. There are lot to learn from sucess stories of well established businessmen, technichal experts and enterpreneurs. Though most of these established people will have different path to success, but the techinal information, business strategies will remain same. How these famous people cope in the difficult situations and remained composed in success will give new entrepreneurs lot of useful information.
Be it democracy, ship, factory or home it can fell apart due to same mistakes that have happened in the past. For example, sitanic ship sinked because as its outer surface were made of material that was not able to resist light rock blow. Bhopal Gas Tragedy happened because people conntinued operating factory even after a warning. People can lear from these mistakes and make better choices.
On a personal level also experiences teaches us a lot. Experciences teaches us how to handle difficult situations that can happen again and help others to avoid it. For example, when a cricketer gets out, he analyzes why he got out with the help replay, that help me to improve his game and avoid similar mistake again. M.S.Dhoni keeper of India Team admitted that he viewed lot of replays of how he keeps wicket when he was dropped from team. Learning from these mistakes and improving his game helped him to get back into the team agian. So, past experiences helps people in improving, be it for a person,communtity or country.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Dhoni
...me and avoid similar mistake again. M.S.Dhoni keeper of India Team admitted that he v...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 544, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...im to get back into the team agian. So, past experiences helps people in improving, be it for a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 606, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , communtity
... people in improving, be it for a person,communtity or country.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02507836991 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79609415263 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611285266458 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6148555476 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0555555556 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0952010162974 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322879539575 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268598059019 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0571154568349 0.150359130593 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00679378964088 0.0667264976115 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.