knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions in today.
It is quiet natural in humans to learn from the mistakes in the past. So, the fact that knowing about the past will not help to take decision for the future seems untrue. On the contrary, understanding the faults done previously will actually help people to take smarter and wise decisions.
Like in case of scientists, knowing the previous results will them help to predict the outcomes as well as compare the results with the earlier ones. Similarly, for cricketers, the prior knowledge of a pitch will help them to predict decent score. Also, in field of share market, understanding the trends of the shares will allow one to invest in wise manner.
Learning from the past has always helped a person and it is often said that one becomes expert in any field if he has learnt from his mistakes. Likewise, for a student interested in pursuing knowledge about latest technology, it is necessary for him to have basic knowledge of the past technologies so that, he will find all the shortcomings in the earlier modules and prepare a new and better one.
Although, it is true that sometimes one should overlook the past results as they may have a negative impact on the objective. For example, despite of working really hard for a competitive exam, the student is unable to get admit in his desired college then, he might think of giving up his future education or may switch to some other field just because of bad results in past. In such cases, the past outcomes should be neglected and one should be more optimistic.
In sum, the past knowledge will always help one to take wise decisions and is often one of the characteristic of a sage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'about the latest'.
Suggestion: about the latest
...tudent interested in pursuing knowledge about latest technology, it is necessary for him to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...other field just because of bad results in past. In such cases, the past outcomes shoul...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en one of the characteristic of a sage.
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'if', 'likewise', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'for example', 'as well as', 'it is true', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.191823899371 0.240241500013 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.14465408805 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100628930818 0.0880659088768 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0534591194969 0.0497285424764 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0440251572327 0.0444667217837 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147798742138 0.12292977631 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0377358490566 0.0406280797675 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56529707991 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0314465408805 0.030933414821 102% => OK
Particles: 0.00314465408805 0.0016655270985 189% => OK
Determiners: 0.106918238994 0.0997080785238 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0408805031447 0.0249443105267 164% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0148568991511 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1655.0 2732.02544248 61% => OK
No of words: 290.0 452.878318584 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70689655172 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.58838876751 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31724137931 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.224137931034 0.280924506359 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.134482758621 0.200843997647 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0965517241379 0.132149295362 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56529707991 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 219.290929204 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527586206897 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 53.0587601881 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 24.1666666667 23.380412469 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4136508303 59.4972553346 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.916666667 141.124799967 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 23.380412469 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 0.674092028746 185% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 46.5804597701 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.55844155844 1.64882698954 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348262220781 0.391690518653 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127807683247 0.123202303941 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0474836951442 0.077325440228 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.684681618237 0.547984918172 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135722953706 0.149214159877 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176045368741 0.161403998019 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679532301748 0.0892212321368 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.35987535564 0.385218514788 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0616186567567 0.0692045440612 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244711913733 0.275328986314 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857557767821 0.0653680567796 131% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.