Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
The assertion that laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and places is a controversial. As one can argue that flexibility in laws allows criminals to misuse them. On the other hand, we can see in some particular cases that harsh times, circumstances and places may result in an impulsive action by a person.
So, as to keep balance between flexible and rigid laws. A government should define a law as flexible or inflexible in the constitution. For instance, some laws should be zero tolerance with no flexibility such as extortion, murder, rape and the criminal should be exonerated immediately. Such is an example of a recent case of rape in India, “The Nirbhaya Rape case” in which one of the accused was a juvenile but was exculpated because he was considered a minor. In such cases the government should have rigid laws for people committing such brutal crimes.
On the other hand, sometimes the circumstances make a rather ingenuous person break the law. For instance ,in a case of self defense if a victim hurts the attacker ,he/she should be able to justify his position before an outcome is encrusted upon by the justice department. But these cases can be exploited and can lead to falsification of documents to render the court’s decisions.
Thus it is very important for a government to keep a check on flexibility of laws and rendering on constitution, for this government can set up a special task which can review the cases and can decide the law applicable to it.
So, I agree with the author to some extent that the laws should be flexible but should be thoroughly monitored. But a country is bound to be doomed if its constitution is being changed or altered frequently, so a government should have maintain a check on this. In some cases, the law needs to be altered for the greater good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ious circumstances, times and places is a controversial. As one can argue that flexibility in l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s, times and places is a controversial. As one can argue that flexibility in laws ...
^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nuous person break the law. For instance ,in a case of self defense if a victim hu...
^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f defense if a victim hurts the attacker ,he/she should be able to justify his pos...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...o render the court's decisions. Thus it is very important for a government t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'maintained'.
Suggestion: maintained
...frequently, so a government should have maintain a check on this. In some cases, the law...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'as to', 'for instance', 'such as', 'in some cases', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.229916897507 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.160664819945 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0803324099723 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0221606648199 0.0497285424764 45% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0221606648199 0.0444667217837 50% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12188365651 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0415512465374 0.0406280797675 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94234080226 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0304709141274 0.030933414821 99% => OK
Particles: 0.00277008310249 0.0016655270985 166% => OK
Determiners: 0.130193905817 0.0997080785238 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0470914127424 0.0249443105267 189% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00831024930748 0.0148568991511 56% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1873.0 2732.02544248 69% => OK
No of words: 321.0 452.878318584 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83489096573 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345794392523 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.239875389408 0.280924506359 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17445482866 0.200843997647 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140186915888 0.132149295362 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94234080226 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 219.290929204 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520249221184 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 53.8092302687 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4 23.380412469 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.490162724 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.866666667 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 23.380412469 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 45.3875389408 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.91891891892 1.64882698954 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355126130778 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111937666684 0.123202303941 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.057504250989 0.077325440228 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.578420888702 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150379616071 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159392064481 0.161403998019 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171480980869 0.0892212321368 192% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.284706902447 0.385218514788 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0352084509889 0.0692045440612 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22589457812 0.275328986314 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119459743153 0.0653680567796 183% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.