A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
While on the surface it my seem that if the government enforces the same curriculum for the entire nation's schools, it may be easier for the colleges to adopt a more uniform and common curriculum without catering to the needs of the students with a slightly different curriculum, this notion is rife with assumptions and is inadequate with regard to its course of action.
One must consider the size of a nation and it's various cultures emboiled in a rich pot of it's heritage before taking any such rash decisions. The students mustn't be made to feel alienated from their culture and instead be taught to embrace their heritage and where they come from, so they don't lose their identity down the generations. While it is obvious that even though it is up to a child on whether to embrace a culture or not, it is not up to the government to strip students of the opportunity to even do so. A curriculum should have content embracing all cultures, foreign and national alike but not at the expense of the local culture, indigenous to a place, as beauty lies not in the herd mentality, rather in individualism.
Also, parents must be given the opton of whether to put their children through strenous curriculum to prepare them better for the entrance exams of prestigious institutions after high school or a more standard curriculum.which is better designed to the natural age of a student withhout pressuring them beyond their years, and it is up to the parents to decide what would be best for their particular ward, rather than the government deciding for them.
Giving no options to students on languages they want to learn is another feature of this prospective decision. Although the availability and quality of the relevant faculty is an issue that must be addressed by the school, stripping the student of the opportunity of learning a different language despite availability of faculty would be a real shame which would've helped them later in life.
While some courses in the curriculum like Math, English etc may be standardized it also boils down to the availability of quality faculty and the quantity of the faculty as well if it is a large school. Standardizing such courses prove to be a stepping stone to students, regardless of what stream they take later in life.
Most colleges now do teach relevant courses in their classes to help new students get up to speed with the academic standards of the institution and so, depriving students of so many wonderful oportunities to avoid becoming just another brick in the world seems a selfish decision taken by the government and would be better to not go through with this decision as it offers not many benefits to the colleges (apart from removal of the orientation courses) or students, or the nation as a whole which would be churning out zombies with the same capabilities as the next.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: mustn't
...g any such rash decisions. The students mustnt be made to feel alienated from their cu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...itage and where they come from, so they dont lose their identity down the generation...
^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: would've
... of faculty would be a real shame which wouldve helped them later in life. While som...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, apart from, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2372.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82113821138 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77411550502 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502032520325 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 23.0359550562 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 140.487051255 60.3974514979 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 215.636363636 118.986275619 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.7272727273 23.4991977007 190% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185459798416 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748889995842 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511236477369 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094110928033 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059313599829 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.6 14.1392134831 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 11.2143820225 175% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.