Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Ecosystem provides a vital role in our life. With the imbalance of ecosystem, there are many problems across the world like global warming, deforestation, pollution. These all happened because of the climate changes in our environment. With the preservation of natural state, we can get a good environment that will directly improve our surroundings. I agree, the government should pass laws which will preserve our habitat.
We all want to stay in pollution free environment. Today, a person grows economically, by a construction of the industries, apartments etc. in big cities. They cut the trees and developing and expand the cities and because of that, we face the water retention these days. In India, there is a Bangalore city, where the water level is one kilometer far away from the ground. This is disturbing our ecosystem, we create pollution and that effects on the global warming.
Due to deforestation, the soil does not hold by tree roots and hence soil get a wash that is the cause of floods, earthquakes, tsunami, tornado in these days. Due to, imbalance of ecosystem across the globe, there is less oxygen in comparison to carbon dioxide in our surroundings. If we grow more trees, protect species that will also benefit our economy by tourism, many hotels will make near and hence create many new jobs. Some countries like Poland and Bhutan where 90 the percent area covered with forest, percentage of oxygen is more than co2, here a person should not cut the tree without the permission of authority. This will happen in other countries too. So all countries should make strict laws against nature disturbance.
Amazon forest is the best example: how we save our natural environment. This place is in the South America, there maximum area covered by brazil and few are covered by Poland and many other countries. Even many countries fund to this forest and to protect endangered species. This area is a tropical region, almost all species and nature preserved. The governments should pass laws that can preserve many other countries forest as well. The government should protect our species by giving the natural state or forests. Many people hunts the animals and made many items like coat, shoes, bags etc. and hence many endangered species left throughout the world. India is the example where less number of white tigers left in a forest. In contrast, population increases day by day and we also expand a big construction in cities. So we can grow economically but this will create big disaster in future if we do not improve nature disturbance on this planet.
In the nutshell, With the increase of population, we need to expand cities and grow economically but this problem like pollution, water retention, global warming and much more solved by grow more trees and preserve forests, all species, and endangered species. However, the government should make some strict laws, so our next generation will proud on us
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02240325866 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69903619765 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474541751527 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7656431619 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3666666667 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.73333333333 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100309334715 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304321342386 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390386063571 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0593332359534 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299794709678 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.