Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
Like base of the pyramid supports all the structure above it, similarly originality is required for supporting the other ideas.
It cannot be said that originality is just putting old ideas together. If, there are no new ideas, then there will not be a base to support other inventions. I will support my this conviction that originality is just not putting old ideas together in new ways, it also means coming up with new and innovative ideas and something that is is not merely putting old ideas together.
Everyone knows about satellites, how satellites are helping to revolutionize the technological world and society and humankind. It is true that satellites launching procedure is amalgam of different technologies such as rocket propulsion, advancement of materials which can sustain high temperatures, etc. Is satellite launch procedure an invention ? Yes, it is. But can we say that satellite launch invention would have been possible without all the advancement and innovations mentioned above? No, that is is not true. Rocket propulsion is the core of Satellite launch operation, rocket propulsion is a true innovation and is not merely a putting old ideas together. Rocket propulsion was actually invented during World War 1. Yes, it was invented for launching weapons, but eventually it is currently used for launching satellites. This would not have been possible without true invention of rocket propulsion. So, yes, true inventions are required to make inventions in the future. But just putting old ideas together is not the only definition of an Originality.
Secondly, everyone knows about internet, we use it daily more than anything else. Internet was invented was DARPA, a military research organization of USA. It was invented for a totally different purpose. It was invented for communication between different branches and the army personals. This was a new thing, a completely original invention without just mixing old ideas. This is an original invention which lead to the development of internet. Internet development would not have been possible without DARPA developing it. So, Originality does mean developing new things also, it is not just taking some old ideas and putting them together and come up with new stuff.
In some countries, Railway is the lifeline of the connectivity. Could railways have developed without development of engine technology ? No, not at all. Railway development was possible because of engine and other related technologies development. These base technologies were required to develop the railways. Yes, railway is also an invention, but it would not have been possible without invention of true ideas, something unique, never thought before and something which is just not putting old ideas together.
So, originality does not only mean putting old ideas together. Originality also means, developing something new and something that is never though before and something that is just not like a lego game.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 334, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...and innovative ideas and something that is is not merely putting old ideas together. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 506, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...d innovations mentioned above? No, that is is not true. Rocket propulsion is the core...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
...ble because of engine and other related technologies development. These base technologies we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, as to, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2511.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3539445629 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94520621657 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420042643923 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 809.1 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6805595181 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.46875 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.65625 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315461068934 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805379970721 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117998792967 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199767416104 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143344869534 0.0667264976115 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.