As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of human to think for themselves is deteriorating.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The speaker asserts that the advancement of technology is laying a deteriorating impact on humans and I completely agree with the speaker. It has been more frequently observed in our lives now a day that technology is takin p=over our creative skills and even our ability to think.
The markets now a days are flooded with mobile phones, smartphones, supercomputers and numerous other quipments which have aided our lives to a much better extent. But these gadgets have made us dependent on them. We are so reliable on them, that even the simplest work which can be done by us in few minutes, we prefer doing it in longer time by gadgets. Instead of thinking about ourselves, we are getting dependent oupon these perishable items. It has surely slower down our thinking ability.
Earlier we had no technological gadgets to remember things or to remind us of tasks we were to perform. Every individual was to keep his own track of work in his mind and plan accordingly. Now with the advancement of technology like the reminders, alarm clocks etc, we are using more of our brains and are getting dependent on them and this ultimately again is decreasing our mental ability to restore things for long.
No doubt, computers have revolutionized the world but yet it has laid some harmful effects on its users. One of them is our over dependence on computer systems. Though the simplest calculations can be done manually without any pain, we try doing basic calculations with computer systems and calculators. Moreover, there is surplus data available online for any school or college project. Children now-a-days copy pre-made projects and assignments from internet instead of creating them on their own. This is ultimately diminishing their mental growth and leading to a computer driven life of college grads, leading to lesser number of erudite student every year.
Nevertheless, technology is decreasing human mental capability to think and restore information, this technology has actually somehow been a boom to the society. As here are two phases of a coin, there are certain benefits of technological advancement for the common man and most importantly for the disabled ones or in industries and offices where technological advancement has actually lead to better ways of learning and more skilled labourers.
Conclusively, technology should actually be used in a limited amount only to simplify our live, not to harness the mental ability of humans. A plethora of anything is worse and so is the case with technological advancement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...en our ability to think. The markets now a days are flooded with mobile phones, smartph...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...ur ability to think. The markets now a days are flooded with mobile phones, smartph...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 389, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
... technological advancement has actually lead to better ways of learning and more ski...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'actually', 'but', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'as to', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.229580573951 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.163355408389 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0927152317881 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.075055187638 0.0497285424764 151% => OK
Pronouns: 0.075055187638 0.0444667217837 169% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.108167770419 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0618101545254 0.0406280797675 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9209578135 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0309050772627 0.030933414821 100% => OK
Particles: 0.00220750551876 0.0016655270985 133% => OK
Determiners: 0.075055187638 0.0997080785238 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00662251655629 0.0249443105267 27% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00883002207506 0.0148568991511 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2549.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 417.0 452.878318584 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11270983213 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.381294964029 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.292565947242 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20623501199 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122302158273 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9209578135 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 219.290929204 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556354916067 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 65.0458128913 55.4138127331 117% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.85 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4047907408 59.4972553346 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.45 141.124799967 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.45 0.674092028746 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 50.1065947242 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.27464788732 1.64882698954 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42776202901 0.391690518653 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0827110798052 0.123202303941 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0488598544031 0.077325440228 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.495583206202 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152824660043 0.149214159877 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137927266674 0.161403998019 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862235062819 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.27230238554 0.385218514788 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0489887947737 0.0692045440612 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269030817175 0.275328986314 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667468150492 0.0653680567796 102% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.