As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
According to the statement technology flings the human experience to the dependency over the past few eras. Living of human has been revolutionized drastically with the blessings of modern technology. Now-a-days people are being connected through mobile phone & internet. Processing calculation of billions of digits within few seconds. Each of these commonplaces has been possible at this 20th era.
The theory just bridges the enormous changes of reduction in the capacity of human thinking. The assumption implies that the technology negates people to think creatively for solving their own problems. Looking back to the introduction, one can have also alternative methods instead of using car, computer or mobile phone. Here Technology just short circuits the way of our thinking to solve the problem.
However, the dependency on technology does not preclude the creativity of thinking that marks the human species. The automobile, Computer, cell phone just save a huge time to think about our living more efficiently. Technology does not make only life easier & comfortable but also invent new method which was not exist yet. For example. Before with a mobile phone we could only communicate with the people but now a days with the combination of computer & technology it has been transferred as smartphone which the people did not even think before inventing a simple mobile phone. As a result people can shrink time & distance inevitably with the help of modern technology.
In contrast to the statement we can see that how technology drives human to think positively & creatively. Internet has now become the most unprecedented means of shares & ideas. By Google & Wikipedia we can learn & know the things what we need in our everyday life. People can now work from remote area & earn by freelancing. Buys & sales now become virtual with Amazon & Alibaba.
Last but not the least reliability on technology makes possible to achieve impossible goals. With the enhancement of Medical Science & Engineering technology now vaccine for Cancer & Aids are being developed to eliminate them completely as the way of Flu drawn out.
Technology will be always blessing for the human experience from the discovery of fire to the nanotechnology. In human race there will be no ending of the problems. There is no way to think negatively with the aspects of technology rather it is the gesture of possibilities to the human efficiency & creativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ut also invent new method which was not exist yet. For example. Before with a mobile ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...ld only communicate with the people but now a days with the combination of computer & tech...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...nly communicate with the people but now a days with the combination of computer & tech...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...before inventing a simple mobile phone. As a result people can shrink time & dista...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, second, so, for example, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30670103093 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94442156056 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4429096631 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7916666667 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265539896697 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072456035326 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657583628773 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134712149152 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670217348973 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.