As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology has made incredible progress in the past few decades. It has become an important part of our life: computers are what we rely heavily on everyday, planes take us everywhere in a short amount of time, and internet is a huge library of all kinds of information. As technology has changed our traditional way of life drastically, are we still able to think like we used to? Did we become less intelligent with the help of technology? The answer is negative. Humans are who created machines and we can definitely keep mastering them.
As technology advances, it generates more problems along the way that requires human, who can generate creativity and possess intrinsic wisdom, to solve them. The machines we created cannot think without us operating them, so they cannot solve the problems they cause, but we can. For example, computers did not detect the rising temperature in the past decades until we use them to analyze the data obtained by astrologists, we realized it was the heat-trapping gases that were produced during industrialization that caused Global Warming. All of these effort do not come from computers but us, human beings. There is no doubt that we still can think for ourselves.
We are utilizing technology to make our lives more convenient, not attaching to it. Without technology, we still can survive. The use of tablets and smart phones is a good example. The different kinds of applications on smart phones have created a revolutionary life style. We can travel everywhere a lot easier with map navigation, can learn the languages everywhere we go, and even search for the nearest restaurants and hotels. Before we can only rely on paper maps, and luck.
Indeed, I cannot deny the fact that some people do attach themselves to technology. When some people are not working, sometimes even when they are at work, they are on their cell phones. Many accidents occur due to people playing cell phones while passing a street, or driving. When processed food is easier and cheaper to purchase, health problems associated with junk food, such as high cholesterol and diabetes, appear more often than before.
In summary, the advancing technology does not deteriorate our thinking. In fact, it frees our minds to a higher level. We think more often and solve more complex problems with the help from technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...: computers are what we rely heavily on everyday, planes take us everywhere in a short a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this effort' or 'these efforts'?
Suggestion: this effort; these efforts
...tion that caused Global Warming. All of these effort do not come from computers but us, huma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while, for example, in fact, in summary, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77807879345 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56887755102 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2205175234 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129084286762 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040378232035 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415119129477 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846198090183 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031173520548 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.