A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
The author maintains that any person who has committed a crime and did not committed the crime without any knowledge of the crime should be deprived of any civil rights and his labor should not near any benefit to him. To some point the author is absolutely right. Crime should never be tolerated and punishment should be exercised accordingly. But to make any judgement solely on the point that the offender knowingly committed the crime; is hard for me to completely agree with it.
To sentence someone for his or her crime is not an easy task to do. There should be issues facts, situations to be considered. The author suggests that anyone who deliberately commits a crime must be discarded of any civil rights. Let's take a scenario where a father assaults another man who was trying kidnap his baby girl. The father is an well educated man, he is a loyal citizen. He knew the consequences and effects of his crime. He still did it. He still assaulted the kidnapper. And he did it with full concscious. Will he also be discarded of his civil rights? Will he be discarded of a fair trial which is a civil right? Are we not going to atleast listen to the man who did everything in his power to save his daughter? He might have committed a crime, but it was the situation that forced him to do it. So, in my opinion before uttering any consequence we should explore the situation of the crime.
Take another scenario where one father punches his daughter's kidnapper and another father makes the kidnapper unconscious. Both have committed crimes under the same situation. But the magnitude of the crimes are different. If we charge both of them 6 months of prison then the first father might think that he should have rather beaten the kidnapper. What I am trying to say is that the magnitude of the crime should be considered. Was the crime really horrible enough to disdain him from any right he has?
Before taking away every right it should be made sure that whether the offender is regretting or not. If the offender regrets for his crime, and the crime is a minor one; but without giving him any right he is punished; this might even push him beyond the edge. With hatred and no belief toward the system, he might become more hostile.
The author also suggests that the offender should not benefit from his or her own labor. If that so, what do we expect next? This will make the offender less penitent in the future. How do we expect him to make an honest buck in the future?
While the author makes very firm points that any kind of offense should not be tolerated, it is hard for me to agree with him to go to the extreme. Before discarding the offender of his rights, his side of the story should be listened, at least. Then any fair judgement should be made accordingly.
Comments
I would rate the approach and
I would rate the approach and support as 'good'.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'commit'
Suggestion: commit
...n who has committed a crime and did not committed the crime without any knowledge of the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rd for me to completely agree with it. To sentence someone for his or her crime...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... must be discarded of any civil rights. Lets take a scenario where a father assaults...
^^^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ing kidnap his baby girl. The father is an well educated man, he is a loyal citize...
^^
Line 2, column 460, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... effects of his crime. He still did it. He still assaulted the kidnapper. And he d...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld explore the situation of the crime. Take another scenario where one father p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... magnitude of the crimes are different. If we charge both of them 6 months of pris...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to disdain him from any right he has? Before taking away every right it should...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... system, he might become more hostile. The author also suggests that the offend...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to make an honest buck in the future? While the author makes very firm points ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'well', 'while', 'at least', 'kind of', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.179347826087 0.240241500013 75% => OK
Verbs: 0.186594202899 0.157235817809 119% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0507246376812 0.0880659088768 58% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0579710144928 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0905797101449 0.0444667217837 204% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0942028985507 0.12292977631 77% => OK
Participles: 0.0489130434783 0.0406280797675 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41129746306 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0307971014493 0.030933414821 100% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.130434782609 0.0997080785238 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0380434782609 0.0249443105267 153% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0199275362319 0.0148568991511 134% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2821.0 2732.02544248 103% => OK
No of words: 505.0 452.878318584 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58613861386 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.310891089109 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.180198019802 0.280924506359 64% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.132673267327 0.200843997647 66% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0930693069307 0.132149295362 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41129746306 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437623762376 0.48968727796 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.9321052775 55.4138127331 90% => OK
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6194690265 165% => OK
Sentence length: 14.8529411765 23.380412469 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3192587284 59.4972553346 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9705882353 141.124799967 59% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8529411765 23.380412469 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.411764705882 0.674092028746 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.21349557522 192% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 32.8727431567 51.4728631049 64% => OK
Elegance: 0.962162162162 1.64882698954 58% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442924576549 0.391690518653 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11189635256 0.123202303941 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.112521557609 0.077325440228 146% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.456657239978 0.547984918172 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149479919038 0.149214159877 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138282796572 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971539079812 0.0892212321368 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.379834108254 0.385218514788 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.102953928778 0.0692045440612 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286641749929 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657181395849 0.0653680567796 101% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 22.0 5.30420353982 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 13.0 3.66592920354 355% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.