The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology does bring efficiency to our life. It can be seen in our daily routine. The faster vehicles enable us to reach our almost effortlessly and give us extra time. However, I cannot agree that it is the primary goal of the technology to let people have leisure time. Boosting the economy and saving people life are also indispensable elements to develop new technology.
Admittedly, technology does bring us efficiency. It gives us a much convenient life and helps us to save times. Nowadays, the prevailing of the transportation system facilitates us to go to places we want to go. In the past, people might spend days, weeks or even months to reach the destinations. On the other hand, today we can go over the same distance with a way less time yet less effort. There is a myriad of transportations from personal to public vehicles, like cars and motorcycles to ferries and airplanes. With the faster speed and less effort spending on the journey, we can enjoy our life with pleasure.
While enjoying our life is an aim of developing tomorrow technology, to do more tasks can be another priority of inventing new high tech. As we known, technology is a meant to save time, given the extra time, workers can have performed better than ever they never ever have. It is the internet that connects every portable device, especially smartphone. Managers nowadays no longer have to actually be in the meeting room to have a presentation to their fellows or administarters. The meeting can be held via the internet, thus, it can be at any given time and location. The more flexible the schedule is the more tasks and projects a group of people can deal with. Eventually, the high tech can boost the productivity of a firm.
To finish much-complicated mission or even salvage people's life from calamity can also be the ultimate goal of the technologic trend. There are a lot of kinds of situations that are too risky for the rescue team to be. Like the burning forest, gas-leaked building or under the deepest ocean floor. To response those conditions safely and readily, different kinds of robots have been invented. Like the apt robot that was created by the JPL. The anomaly body configuration enables it to handle different severe environments that are too dangerous for the human being. The final mission, which is saving people life, reflects one of the final destination of the robotic technology.
While, there is no gainsaying that giving people a mush enjoyable life is the goal of the next high-tech, providing a convenient real or virtual world for the company and rescuing people from death are also critical when conceiving tomorrow technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'knew'?
Suggestion: knew
...ority of inventing new high tech. As we known, technology is a meant to save time, gi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86433260394 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75474352126 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54704595186 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4472080633 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3333333333 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9259259259 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194890915444 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505804747319 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551359146447 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106293871188 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430080195866 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.