The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
The author here argues that the real talent of a renowned musician cannot be correctly assessed until they die since their fame effects the assessment but now a days,it can be considered as a fallacy because the talent is assessed by appeasing all classes of people not a single person or only a small group.
For instance,in India,consider A.R.RAHMAN,an oscar award winner.His music work is assessed and recognised as one of the best pieces of creation though he is alive and he is also not as famous as many other musicians.So,this can be considered as an example to show that fame does not interfere with assessment.
There are also many other musicians whose talents got a fair amount of recognition:some are recognised by other senior musicians and other by people through polls and surveys conducted by media and assessed without the intervention of their fame and background.
Hence,In present scenario,it cannot be concluded that real talent of a musician cannot be decided until he has been dead for several years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...e their fame effects the assessment but now a days,it can be considered as a fallacy becau...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...eir fame effects the assessment but now a days,it can be considered as a fallacy becau...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...me effects the assessment but now a days,it can be considered as a fallacy because ...
^^^
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...son or only a small group. For instance,in India,consider A.R.RAHMAN,an oscar awar...
^^^
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , consider
...ly a small group. For instance,in India,consider A.R.RAHMAN,an oscar award winner.His mu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , an
...or instance,in India,consider A.R.RAHMAN,an oscar award winner.His music work is as...
^^^
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: His
...nsider A.R.RAHMAN,an oscar award winner.His music work is assessed and recognised a...
^^^
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...o not as famous as many other musicians.So,this can be considered as an example to...
^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...not as famous as many other musicians.So,this can be considered as an example to show...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h assessment. There are also many other musicians whose talents got a fair amoun...
^^
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , In
...ion of their fame and background. Hence,In present scenario,it cannot be concluded...
^^^
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...d background. Hence,In present scenario,it cannot be concluded that real talent of...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'so', 'for instance']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227979274611 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.165803108808 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0984455958549 0.0880659088768 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0673575129534 0.0497285424764 135% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0414507772021 0.0444667217837 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.150259067358 0.12292977631 122% => OK
Participles: 0.0673575129534 0.0406280797675 166% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01271239685 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00518134715026 0.030933414821 17% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0984455958549 0.0997080785238 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0259067357513 0.0249443105267 104% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00518134715026 0.0148568991511 35% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1024.0 2732.02544248 37% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 170.0 452.878318584 38% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02352941176 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 4.58838876751 79% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370588235294 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.258823529412 0.280924506359 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182352941176 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129411764706 0.132149295362 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01271239685 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 219.290929204 47% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605882352941 0.48968727796 124% => OK
Word variations: 55.1683216703 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 4.0 20.6194690265 19% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 42.5 23.380412469 182% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3343349287 59.4972553346 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 256.0 141.124799967 181% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.5 23.380412469 182% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.25 0.674092028746 185% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.21349557522 230% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 68.3823529412 51.4728631049 133% => OK
Elegance: 1.62264150943 1.64882698954 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398504268951 0.391690518653 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.158835969862 0.123202303941 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100302031287 0.077325440228 130% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 1.0 0.547984918172 182% => Sentence paragraph similarity is high.
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 9.61481343192e-17 0.149214159877 0% => Sentences are similar to each other in a paragraph.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.246871299327 0.161403998019 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12598512642 0.0892212321368 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.143927488928 0.385218514788 37% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.08687858204 0.0692045440612 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246871299327 0.275328986314 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12598512642 0.0653680567796 193% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 3.0 13.5995575221 22% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.