Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The claim asserts that scandals can in a way be useful for the society, as they may allow people to have a better look at the problems, which many of the reformers and thinkers might not able to do. Though the claim may seem to be inappropriate, but it is actually very true. Scandals easily catch the attention of people, thereby bringing to focus the various problems of the society.
Firstly scandals are actually real life incidents, they are not hypothetical events. They occur in our society, so it is easier for the common public to relate to them, understand them and in doing that the problems concerned are also brought to light. For example, I can consider the CWG scam in my country INDIA, where the problem of corruption has long been a major source of evil for the society. As the rampant corruption that was prevalent during the build up to games, was exposed it opened the eyes of the masses. All those involved in this vicious cycle of corruption were exposed. The problems of funds meant for development being mismanaged for personal gains, and the pathetic, poorly managed sporting bodies all came to light.
Secondly, it is human tendency that it gets easily attracted to bad things, like in comedy the more vulgar the jokes are, the louder is one going to laugh. Similarly scandals are also outcome of the wrong acts. They easily attract the attention of the people. Scandals provide a source of fuel to the hot debates in media. These media houses while trying to publicize the issues for their own personal benefits, ultimately highlight a lot of the key problems, which otherwise may not get any due public attention. Consider the recent events of shooting of black people in USA by the Police Officers. The recent events hotly debated in news shows have once again opened questions regarding the racial discrimination against blacks.
Moreover it is not necessary that scandals can only focus the attention on problems in society always. Scandals covering aspects varying from sex life of celebrities to celebrity gossip to some other trivial matter, are in no way of any relevant worth for the society.
In conclusion though scandals are a product of the diabolical things prevalent in the society, they actually do make it easier for general masses to perceive problems in a better and effective manner than a speaker or a reformer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... are, the louder is one going to laugh. Similarly scandals are also outcome of the wrong ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... racial discrimination against blacks. Moreover it is not necessary that scandals can o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...us the attention on problems in society always. Scandals covering aspects varying from...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'similarly', 'so', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242081447964 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.14479638009 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0950226244344 0.0880659088768 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0588235294118 0.0497285424764 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0407239819005 0.0444667217837 92% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131221719457 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0452488687783 0.0406280797675 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.54880794087 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0361990950226 0.030933414821 117% => OK
Particles: 0.00226244343891 0.0016655270985 136% => OK
Determiners: 0.119909502262 0.0997080785238 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0158371040724 0.0249443105267 63% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00904977375566 0.0148568991511 61% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2363.0 2732.02544248 86% => OK
No of words: 404.0 452.878318584 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84900990099 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383663366337 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269801980198 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.190594059406 0.200843997647 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0965346534653 0.132149295362 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54880794087 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 219.290929204 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561881188119 0.48968727796 115% => OK
Word variations: 65.4339008611 55.4138127331 118% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2631578947 23.380412469 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7689839656 59.4972553346 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.368421053 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 23.380412469 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.894736842105 0.674092028746 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 48.2433559145 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.71296296296 1.64882698954 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357735044724 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0915221854685 0.123202303941 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0433764536222 0.077325440228 56% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572523976519 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.178813958985 0.149214159877 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154120950778 0.161403998019 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668872938297 0.0892212321368 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.438438896436 0.385218514788 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.109175930918 0.0692045440612 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266681058123 0.275328986314 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028998314219 0.0653680567796 44% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.