Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The scandal can cause more attention than the speaker and reformer issues, rendering helpful. Although it can be ture in some cases, it is nor comprehensive enough to cover all the instances.
There is no gainsaying that few people are welling to listen what reformers or speakers are trying to convey. Laypeople barely prone to take issues that do not immediately invovle in their daily life seriously. That is what we have seen across the world when it comes to environment protecting issue. While there may be a few people are eager to reverse the damage that the human has made since centuries ago, the vast majority, especially those in the developing country, are blind to the warning that eco-friendly speaker are conveying due to the fact that it is their priority to make fortune. However, when the scandal like companies are colluding with the politician and dumpt the waste to places that it is no suppose to be is revealed, people will focus on that issue. Becasue people are not welling to see the politician that they electe he or she to be, doing filthy affair, like bride. In this case, scandals can attract a way more spotlight than speakers and reformers.
However, in todays socail medias are full of negative scandals. Scandals like sex, drinking alchol or prostitude. Although those who have committed convictions like that are sinful, there is no relation between the sin and thier profession. It is public assumption that peolple who have sex with person that they should not have or addict to the alchol can not be on the stage. On the other word, those who are slaughters in their personal life can also be a sniper in their professional one. Unless the connection between the scandal and those who have committed the it is clairfy, it is redundant to attract more attention on the scandal.
In addition, the credibility of the scandal should also be vindicated before hand. That is to say, it can be good to draw the focus on the scandal but the source of it should be trustworthy. On the other hand, sources that speakers and reformer collectes their data or information from mostly are credible. The public attraction cannot be regarded as one of the indicators that divulges the usefulness of a method. It is too risky to depend on an anonymous scandal since it can orient people to the wrong direction. Thus,the definition of usefulness should also takes that into accont.
In sum, scandals do facilitate people to put more attention on an issue. As useful as it seem, it is too assetive to underestimate its drawback like cause uncessary attention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: SUPPOSE_TO[1]
Message: Probably you should use a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...dumpt the waste to places that it is no suppose to be is revealed, people will focus on...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... on the stage. On the other word, those who are slaughters in their personal life can a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...he scandal and those who have committed the it is clairfy, it is redundant to attract ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
...f the scandal should also be vindicated before hand. That is to say, it can be good to draw...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 521, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ient people to the wrong direction. Thus,the definition of usefulness should also ta...
^^^^
Line 7, column 563, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
...he definition of usefulness should also takes that into accont. In sum, scandals ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
... attention on an issue. As useful as it seem, it is too assetive to underestimate it...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in some cases, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82921348315 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63005268466 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492134831461 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9791621436 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4347826087 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.347826087 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91304347826 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167104777456 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501972143608 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338988976727 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938930280057 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250538330263 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.