Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
The nature has numerous animals, birds and plants which are on the verge of extinction. Some because of the faults of human beings and others because of their own mistakes or due to other environmental conditions. But, is it our responsibility to look after each and every such species and save them from their fate? We should put our efforts to save the species that are getting extinct due to human mistakes and then think of helping others.
Human beings don’t have the right to cause the extinction for any living species. But it is not our sole responsibility to secure and nurture all living beings on earth which are getting vanished. To put it in another way, there might be wild animals which are endangered due to large number of furious predators. But it is not possible for us to save each and every such living creature. Such attempt will not only be void but will also lead to huge loss of human resources. Of course it is not feasible for human being to take control of the food chain in an uninhabited wild jungle or in deep under seas. Again interfering in natural food chain may also cause harm to other species which were living in harmony. Ultimately, we will be disturbing the balance of food chain and indirectly harming or rather endangering the existence of some other animals.
Furthermore, although being the most superior species, we don’t have the right to interfere with the nature’s wish. Some species might be endangered by their own natural and environmental surrounding. In such case, it’s the natures wish to end up the species there to secure some other resources. As an illustration, the extinction of dinosaurs was by the wish of Mother Nature. If any other species had interfered in that phenomenon, many other species including ours would not have come to existence. Hence, it is sometimes a part of nature’s curriculum to extinct a species to give space for new ones and we should never interrupt any such process.
On the contrary, being gifted by so much control over the nature, we too have a responsibility to take care of the helpless flora and fauna. There might be creatures which are getting extinct due to severe natural calamities. If we have the power to help such species to move to a place where the can grow in number without effecting the natures balance, we should always do so. Many species might indirectly be effected by the industrialization and other hazards caused by human beings without our knowledge. Hence turning a deaf ear to their call will never be a wise decision.
As has been noted above, some living creatures are getting effected by our misdeeds beyond our knowledge. But it does not necessarily mean that we should be helping each and every disappearing species and thereby go against the nature’s wish to bring a change. To sum up, we can conclude that rescuing and helping all species which are about to extinct will not be a wise or economically feasible idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 511, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... by human beings without our knowledge. Hence turning a deaf ear to their call will n...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'of course', 'on the contrary', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204506065858 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.175043327556 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0970537261698 0.0880659088768 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0485268630849 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.050259965338 0.0444667217837 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0970537261698 0.12292977631 79% => OK
Participles: 0.051993067591 0.0406280797675 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74575477993 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0467937608319 0.030933414821 151% => OK
Particles: 0.00346620450607 0.0016655270985 208% => OK
Determiners: 0.0901213171577 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0294627383016 0.0249443105267 118% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155979202773 0.0148568991511 105% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2979.0 2732.02544248 109% => OK
No of words: 512.0 452.878318584 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.818359375 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.30859375 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.244140625 0.280924506359 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.146484375 0.200843997647 73% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10546875 0.132149295362 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74575477993 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 219.290929204 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451171875 0.48968727796 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.9527913741 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.6923076923 23.380412469 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9654982735 59.4972553346 44% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.576923077 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 23.380412469 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.461538461538 0.674092028746 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 44.1063701923 51.4728631049 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.29113924051 1.64882698954 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394019016213 0.391690518653 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0901663949707 0.123202303941 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0584373562027 0.077325440228 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.478705035794 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120006296708 0.149214159877 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144196686381 0.161403998019 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787110951528 0.0892212321368 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.426873505022 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0570141031881 0.0692045440612 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274065772555 0.275328986314 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888017858739 0.0653680567796 136% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.