Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgement.
Whether or not the government officials should consider the will of people they serve when they make decisions is controversial. Although sometimes making decisions regardless of the will of people can improve the work efficiency of public officials, its occurrence would lead to autocracy.
At the first place, when government officials make decisions, they must consider the opinions of citizens because the citizens are the people officials work for and please. Regardless of the will of citizens, the government would take risks of losing the supports and trust for the reason that citizens, including those supporters, cannot be satisfied by the behavior and decisions of officials. For example, response to the improving requirement of legal same-sex marriage, Barack Obama administration urged the Supreme Court to rule in favor of same-sex couples.
However, the government officials should not make any decision according to the will of citizens. On the one hand, the divisive opinions in citizens would confuse the officials. The officials could not carry out everyone’s opinion and it is impossible for them to satisfy every citizen. Under this circumstance, the officials must make decisions on their own judgement, which is the ability they are expected to possess. On the other hand, decisions made by officials should benefit the whole country not specific person or some moral principles. For example, although many Americans repelled the war to Iraq and expected a more peaceful negotiation, the American government had to fight for the dominance in the Middle East.
The another important issue we have to discuss is how to draw a line about what kind of decisions should be made with the will of citizens. To simplify it, we can divide the decisions and the policies into citizen-benefit one and politic-benefit one. For the decisions and policies relate the benefits of citizens, such as medical insurance, education and public health, government officials have to consider the will of citizens. For the problems about military, finance and politics, the officials should keep calm and justifiable and make their own decisions though they may confront various opinions.
In conclusion, whether or not the government made decisions with the will of the people they serve should be discussed according to different conditions. The correct policies and decisions should maximize the benefits of both individuals and the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether or not the government officials should ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not the government officials should conside...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 16, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...nt various opinions. In conclusion, whether or not the government made decisions with the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259953161593 0.240241500013 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.135831381733 0.157235817809 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0655737704918 0.0880659088768 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0234192037471 0.0497285424764 47% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0327868852459 0.0444667217837 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112412177986 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0257611241218 0.0406280797675 63% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93223461715 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0304449648712 0.030933414821 98% => OK
Particles: 0.00234192037471 0.0016655270985 141% => OK
Determiners: 0.124121779859 0.0997080785238 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.056206088993 0.0249443105267 225% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0140515222482 0.0148568991511 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2469.0 2732.02544248 90% => OK
No of words: 383.0 452.878318584 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.44647519582 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.409921671018 0.366273622748 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.34725848564 0.280924506359 124% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.297650130548 0.200843997647 148% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.195822454308 0.132149295362 148% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93223461715 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 219.290929204 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485639686684 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 51.8992141587 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5294117647 23.380412469 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6207435386 59.4972553346 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.235294118 141.124799967 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5294117647 23.380412469 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.674092028746 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 57.2552603287 51.4728631049 111% => OK
Elegance: 2.07317073171 1.64882698954 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430476277816 0.391690518653 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131818033445 0.123202303941 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.06276548873 0.077325440228 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.665451639459 0.547984918172 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0993323902896 0.149214159877 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211021220008 0.161403998019 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789502968098 0.0892212321368 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.562070464096 0.385218514788 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0220964053785 0.0692045440612 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316959850912 0.275328986314 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439071192611 0.0653680567796 67% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.