Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether political leaders must ignore the public opinion and give up the principle for the sake of compromise or they should stay consistently committed to particular principles and goals. Indisputably, it is not good for the public if leaders would deviate from their promise. Nevertheless, it is essential to fulfil their promise which he had done before becoming leader. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that political leaders abandon principle for the sake of compromise to be effective one, and would argue that they should stay consistently committed to a particular principles and goals.
First of all, by remaining committed to the particular principles and objectives leaders can win the hearts of millions of people by consummating their promise. I would like to point out that the credence of people is very essential, almost for everything, to become an effective leader because then public keep values of their leaders and also follow the rules made by the leaders. To illustrate this, let us look at the example of leaders in India. In India, if the leader does something good, but very few times, the people follow the laws, respect them and even they vote them to become the leader for the next time. If I talk closely in my state of Bihar in India, the chief minister has been appointed as the three times or 15 years because of their works, development of the state in 15 years and continuing their development still for public of state. Due to these continuing developments, people like him and chose him as a chief minister since 15 years or three times continuously. That’s why it is pretty obvious that political leaders must carrying out their promise.
Furthermore, if the leader does what they had said previously, the public become happy and they do the work enthusiastically and fulfil their responsibility to make their nation more developed and more economic. The GDP of countries increase and life of poor people improve as time passes because of their dedication and devotion towards work and non-biased nature of leader. As a consequence, the leaders also get motivated for the resultant development of the province or nation and it also encourage them to make country more developed.
Admittedly, most of the time, leaders don’t attenuate their promise and they just think about themselves. This is true especially when it comes to the welfare of nation and common people faces lots of difficulty, only people with the leaders get advantaged. All this makes leader substandard and people want them to resign from the politics. In addition, people don’t fulfil their responsibility towards their own nation because of this nature of leader and economy goes down, non-employment increases rapidly and as a consequence people migrate to another country for better life and employment etc. Therefore, the leaders should not give up their sake of promise in any case.
In conclusion, although most of the leaders are for the sake of promise, leaders should try to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. As long as, few leaders are doing their best to fulfil the requirements of nation’s development, we should also take our responsibility even if the leaders abandon their sake of promise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encourages'?
Suggestion: encourages
...t of the province or nation and it also encourage them to make country more developed. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge them to make country more developed. Admittedly, most of the time, leaders do...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2803.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1620626151 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89040347853 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453038674033 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 873.0 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1178154178 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.476190476 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7619047619 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300145549324 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112157504116 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680316851008 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195370668509 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739249591057 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.