Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
Young minds are impressionable entities, capable of being moulded in early years. This puts the responsibility on the societies shoulder to help the child grow through its formative years into adulthood by imparting it with suitable education. Thus, teaching a foundation of logical reasoning is one such way to build develop future generation in face of the several advantages it provides.
Firstly, when we are positioned with question of the kind of teachings that should make up the educational foundation, it becomes a challenge deciding between the moral and the logical education. However, considering the trade-offs between the two, the logical education holds higher ground given that it is relatively unbiased and enables one to make decisions which are generally better for the society as the whole. To illustrate this point, consider the case World War I, where the island nation Japan was defeated thereby halting the political juggernaut it had become. Japan's ambitions surpassed the moral grounds as it went on a rampage to conquer every nation it possibly could. Had the contesting countries restricted their efforts to prevent Japan from conquering the world on moral grounds (and hence not bombing the nation), the world might have not been the same as we see it today. It was the logic that helped countries triumph over Japan, thus resulting the development of the peaceful Japan as we know today. Thus, logical thinking fares better as it enables one to take faster and more informer decisions compred to moral ones, which involve a lot of deliberation.
Secondly, logical reasoning is essential for technological advancement, which the moral education fails to provide. The unrestrained prowess of the logical mind has changed the world , evolving over years, and is in fact growing exponentially since 2000. Again, in this case, the logical mind (and hence a more knowledgeable mind) exhibited the capacity of humans to go beyond the imaginable and develop innovations which we couldn't have imagined few years back. From the Artificial intelligence to Site-specific gene editing techniques, the world has made great strides in this space. again, the moral education doesn't appear to feature anywhere in assiting this advancement.
However, moral teachings comes with its own merits as it allows us to become more compassionate human, capable of empathising with other beings. Further, morality can't be all eliminated, lest we humans transform into robots incapable of emotions , simply performing our duties running on a logical mind. But, again, we need to understand that the pace at which human race is growing, the moral education might not help as much as the logical teaching because weare in greater need to equip our children with tools (or thinking) to connect disparate entities. In fact, it comes more to the survival of our race in face of the several challenges that the earth faces. to combat such problem, again, a foundation of logical education would better position the young generation in creating advances to foster our race.
Thus, to conclude, logical reasoning should become the focus of education as it provides it with benefits which the moral education lacks- expansive thinking and fostering innovation. Humans being social animals are already designed to exhibit moral attitude in life and may not really need to be impressed upon with moral teachings, as it comes naturally to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f the logical mind has changed the world , evolving over years, and is in fact gro...
^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...inable and develop innovations which we couldnt have imagined few years back. From the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Again
...d has made great strides in this space. again, the moral education doesnt appear to f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... this space. again, the moral education doesnt appear to feature anywhere in assiting ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachings'' or 'teaching's'?
Suggestion: teachings'; teaching's
...ing this advancement. However, moral teachings comes with its own merits as it allows ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ng with other beings. Further, morality cant be all eliminated, lest we humans trans...
^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nsform into robots incapable of emotions , simply performing our duties running on...
^^
Line 7, column 665, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...everal challenges that the earth faces. to combat such problem, again, a foundatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, thus, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2889.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25272727273 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77628392671 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529090909091 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 914.4 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5853785096 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.318181818 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24994535114 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073011767631 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048784683552 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143476158668 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025543174342 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.