Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author claims, The students are the main criteria for their teachers salaries based on their academic performance. In my opinion, I would disagree with the author, because considering only the academics is inappropriate to evaluate a teachers knowledge and performance. We should also consider other perspectives such as experience, clarity, sociability etc.
When the professors are instructed by the management, that their salaries are based on the students performance, the first thought they think is to make profit for them-self. So, it results in pursuing only the academic classes in schools rather than teaching non-academic classes. The non-academic classes are essential to mold a child to prepare them for adulthood like teaching manners and how to act in societies and act in different circumstances.
Then, by only considering the students performance, the teacher's capabilities are diminished. For example, If an experienced professor is forced in such a way, his way of teaching style will be largely varies. And he may not give his full potential to motivate the students in adaptive learning. Thus, the schools or colleges will become business minded environment. Therefore, by implementing this will reducing the quality of education.
In other cases, some of the teachers gets motivated by these incentives and teaches well and give confidence to the students to score higher. Also, academics are as important in students life such that teachers should teach well to increase their level of learning and to make a salary rise for them-self.
In conclusion, The teacher's salary should be based not only on their students performance but also on the other things such as their teaching capabilities, experience etc.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...cademics is inappropriate to evaluate a teachers knowledge and performance. We should al...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as experience, clarity, sociability etc. When the professors are instructed by th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...t, that their salaries are based on the students performance, the first thought they thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ances. Then, by only considering the students performance, the teachers capabilities ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...t. Therefore, by implementing this will reducing the quality of education. In other c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...uality of education. In other cases, some of the teachers gets motivated by these incent...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry rise for them-self. In conclusion, The teachers salary should be based not ...
^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...e for them-self. In conclusion, The teachers salary should be based not only on thei...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256578947368 0.240241500013 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.148026315789 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0756578947368 0.0880659088768 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0559210526316 0.0497285424764 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0493421052632 0.0444667217837 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121710526316 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0526315789474 0.0406280797675 130% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06155977375 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0328947368421 0.030933414821 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0921052631579 0.0997080785238 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0263157894737 0.0249443105267 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00657894736842 0.0148568991511 44% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1746.0 2732.02544248 64% => OK
No of words: 272.0 452.878318584 60% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 6.41911764706 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.58838876751 89% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.400735294118 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.352941176471 0.280924506359 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.294117647059 0.200843997647 146% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.158088235294 0.132149295362 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06155977375 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 219.290929204 68% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.48968727796 113% => OK
Word variations: 55.5561269058 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4285714286 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3742790525 59.4972553346 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.674092028746 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 54.7226890756 51.4728631049 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.7012987013 1.64882698954 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439530403838 0.391690518653 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103614441271 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.097853657466 0.077325440228 127% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.580309589323 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18092463292 0.149214159877 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183237192017 0.161403998019 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919332171535 0.0892212321368 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.297611456036 0.385218514788 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0564240974658 0.0692045440612 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296029597802 0.275328986314 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418922859731 0.0653680567796 64% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.