Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
eachers are the building blocks of future of a society that is "youth of the nation". A teacher is always praised for his/her selfless behaviour and a dedication to plant seeds of knowledge within children. It is our prime duty to appreciate and boost the confidence of teachers by rewarding them or by appraisal for their deeds. Instead of this, if teachers will be paid according to the performance of student's in academics, it would cast a negative impression upon this profession altogether.
Every student has his or her own capability to study and to grasp information which is being taught to him/her. Teachers' role is to guide and enlighten the right path and to motivate the student so as they perform well in all phases of life. I we take an example of two teachers' who are equally putting their equal efforts towards two different children supposedly. If the first student is an erudite scholar and is pretty much resolute to succeed, certainly he would be scoring good in his exams. On the contrary if a second student is very sluggish, lathargic and reserved, unable to express his areas of difficulty to the teacher and is not much determined to score good, he would comparably get lesser marks than the first student. Now if we follow the principal of paying teacher's according to the student's performances, it would be an injustice done to the second tutor, as he paid his equal time, attention and devotion as the first one. So, this rule should not be applied as such.
At some extent, I do agree with the author that if the salaries will be based upon student's performance, every teacher would actually add more of his effort and this arduous behaviour will lead to better student performances anyhow. But the whole of the salary should not be based upon this fact. Instead there should be some incentives provided to teachers' which should be based upon such monitoring.
Additionally, It would be better if there are some laws or norms of awards or incentives provided to teachers' on the basis of their student's performance, which should be apart from their monthly salary. This would keep them boosted to teach well and will also aid in better performances of student's.
Conclusively, i wold like to say that the student teacher relationship is a pious one. It should not be make with selfish intentions as it would affect the harmony of work place. Although, it is the duty of teachers' to be skilled and up to date with the new teaching pattern and concepts, but evaluating their performance according to student's score would be an injustice to all those teachers' who are genuinely good and are adding the best of their potential to this field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Eachers
eachers are the building blocks of future of a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ary should not be based upon this fact. Instead there should be some incentives provide...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'apart from', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.210317460317 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0714285714286 0.0880659088768 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0595238095238 0.0497285424764 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0595238095238 0.0444667217837 134% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.109126984127 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0456349206349 0.0406280797675 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71351663745 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.047619047619 0.030933414821 154% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0952380952381 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0376984126984 0.0249443105267 151% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0119047619048 0.0148568991511 80% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2684.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 462.0 452.878318584 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80952380952 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.333333333333 0.366273622748 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261904761905 0.280924506359 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181818181818 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116883116883 0.132149295362 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71351663745 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 219.290929204 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489177489177 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 55.6597994003 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.3157894737 23.380412469 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3853960489 59.4972553346 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.263157895 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3157894737 23.380412469 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.674092028746 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 50.5062656642 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.27777777778 1.64882698954 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390103713366 0.391690518653 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129574186465 0.123202303941 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.109967980669 0.077325440228 142% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.554454071213 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174922818795 0.149214159877 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161330214364 0.161403998019 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709343618052 0.0892212321368 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375496822429 0.385218514788 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.033552561691 0.0692045440612 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27908210844 0.275328986314 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363819208212 0.0653680567796 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.