Teachers should get paid according to the performance of the student
I do not take part in supporting the statement stating "Teachers should get paid according to the performance of the student". Teachers are playing important role in the society to educate novice students to make a better generation of youth who are going to partake in country's vital roles. Teachers are the main guide to shape an amorphous mind of one student. In schools and colleges, they build their career to strive for better future. Students learn about value and ethics from teachers. So it will not be wrong to admit the great role of teachers are not only teaching Mathematics, Science or Economics but also motivating students for future.
Firstly, it will not be prudent to say teachers only teach students just for money as in most of the countries we can generally see teachers are underpaid and they have to struggle a lot to lead general lifestyle. If it would be all about money, they could easily move to other jobs to earn more to lead one lavish lifestyle leaving the career of all students in dark. They do serve as teachers also because they take it as their passion for teaching new minds and create new history. So it will be pathetic to judge their contribution only by one prospect and it will literally hinder their open mentality to teach students. It can be used as an example of the humble contribution of teachers by adding that mostly in universities students get better jobs on the completion of their degrees and most of the times much more than the teacher who did take their classes. So it is all obvious if that teacher wanted to get a better position to earn much money he can always move to the jobs that his students are getting in. So it is never about money. By reducing the salary of one teacher we only can disrespect him.
Secondly, it is not fixed how many students in a class are good or how many students are bad as there is no clear definition of good performance. So maybe in one year there are all good students and in next year may be average students suppress the number of good students. So it does not solely depend on the teacher to get one overall good score. It is possible that in two class of 40 students one class having a majority of average quality students and another class having all the good students and in that case teacher of the first class can be more efficient to teach where the second class teacher does not even fulfill the requirements of a good teacher. Still, second class will have a better performance.
Thirdly, by taking the ability of all students in a particular field as granted we are just forcing them to opt what we want them to opt. Some students in a class may not find mathematics as an easy subject where majority them may have interest to paint. So, it can not be concluded that the mathematics teacher did not teach students perfectly just by checking the mathematics marks. On the other hand majority of students may find language to the easy and can score great so it also does not imply that language teacher taught them well.
Summing up the whole point it can be concluded that the performances of students solely do not rely on the process and efficiency of the class teacher who did take the classes. It is a mutual process to understand and interpret the concept where a teacher may do his duties perfectly but students may fail which may give the total different result of performance.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.207692307692 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.173846153846 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0938461538462 0.0880659088768 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0676923076923 0.0497285424764 136% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0615384615385 0.0444667217837 138% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.115384615385 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0353846153846 0.0406280797675 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.52793543072 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0384615384615 0.030933414821 124% => OK
Particles: 0.00153846153846 0.0016655270985 92% => OK
Determiners: 0.0892307692308 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0353846153846 0.0249443105267 142% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0153846153846 0.0148568991511 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3403.0 2732.02544248 125% => OK
No of words: 611.0 452.878318584 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56955810147 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.58838876751 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.297872340426 0.366273622748 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230769230769 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162029459902 0.200843997647 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0785597381342 0.132149295362 59% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52793543072 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 219.290929204 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412438625205 0.48968727796 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.6044606931 55.4138127331 90% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 24.44 23.380412469 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.981571908 59.4972553346 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.12 141.124799967 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.44 23.380412469 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.56 0.674092028746 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 47.5169230769 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.18274111675 1.64882698954 72% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418631841386 0.391690518653 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.142396382773 0.123202303941 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0842989018214 0.077325440228 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.517480547775 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167742725434 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160678607256 0.161403998019 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132314276569 0.0892212321368 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.42751930746 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0504749609825 0.0692045440612 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294442310947 0.275328986314 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109779005369 0.0653680567796 168% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.4325221239 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 16.0 7.22455752212 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 22.0 13.5995575221 162% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.