There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts -- especially at a great cost in money and jobs -- to save endangered animal or plant species.
Society undergo various changes over time in order to meet current standard of living or to meet the future expectation's. Society have witnessed changes like racism, feminism, caste and many more which were need in order to implement some ideology or to prevent discrimination between the communities or even gender's. Society should always try to make sure not to damage other's or defame in order to increase standard of living, or even earning money.
First is the example of Tesla, the trillion dollar electric vehicle company, which tried it's best to revolutionise the transport industry by developing electric vehicle against convectional diesel or petrol vehicle's. Vehicle's manufactured by Tesla produces almost zero amount of pollution and saves other's like human being from inhaling toxic gases, keeping environment cool and implicitly helping animal's and birds in leaving their life peacefully. What if we never tried to lower pollution by any means, it would have affected everyone living on earth.
Second is the example of Brazil, which encompasses world's largest rainforest. Brazilian Government is allowing foreign investor's and local's to exploit it's forest in order to improve the living of people and gradual increase in countries development. But by exploiting we are exploiting not only the largest source of oxygen but also the habitat of animal's and plant's. The animal's wont be able to find food in limited environment, so they will threaten human being living in outskirt's of forest which in return will kill them. This not only disturb the natural cycle but also ensure the inability to recover it.
Third is the example of the China, one of the leading economy in the world. China is approbated for their economic growth and also criticised for their inappropriate use of nature. China is largest carbon producer in the world, carbon gas which is responsible for the global warming. The more carbon we produce more global warming it encourage, even after being the leading country, China choose 2070 as the year to go carbon neutral.
I do not completely agree with the statement that there is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts -- especially at a great cost in money and jobs -- to save endangered animal or plant species. There are some government's and private institutions which are working in order to prevent some species from getting extinct like white rhino's, while some government's and institution's are working for their own benefit. What one should compromise in order to save other totally depends on the person's, government's and parties mindset. Some work hard to improve their standard of living without harming other's while some improve by endangering other's.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'undergoes'.
Suggestion: undergoes
Society undergo various changes over time in order to m...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...etween the communities or even genders. Society should always try to make sure not to d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the largest'.
Suggestion: worlds the largest
...he example of Brazil, which encompasses worlds largest rainforest. Brazilian Government is all...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the largest'.
Suggestion: is the largest
...heir inappropriate use of nature. China is largest carbon producer in the world, carbon ga...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encourages'?
Suggestion: encourages
...arbon we produce more global warming it encourage, even after being the leading country, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2356979405 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68741356432 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1795667545 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.421052632 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42105263158 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216728121481 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623604384172 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158577989638 0.0758088955206 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997855617713 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117403758451 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.