There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.
Every passing days, some animals or plants are having a real tough time to cope with the changes and are in the verge of extinction. Such endangered plants and animals are on the radar of society but there is always one question looming: is it worth to go the distance to save them in terms of our limiting source and time. I have a little doubt. In this ever speeding phase of technological discoveries where there are numerous possibilities out there to be looked upon, which can lead or jump start our campaign for the future. Spending a whole lot of time and money for saving in many cases inevitable extinct species is not justifiable to the society.
There are many situations leading the species to the verge of extinction which are summed up as endangered species. Their physical and physiological features, their feeding habit, their habitat. Many such factors lead to the extinction. The clear sign here is they are not being able to move along with the changes and the world is ever more changing. More rapid changes will come for sure. In such scenario, we may be able to save them for now but can we forever? With already many more big problems out there in the world like hunger, disease and illiteracy; It can never be justified to spend the time and jobs and money to these somewhat minor cases.
As we already knew from the above paragraph, that the world is changing (rapidly). The population is increasing and the main challenge for the future is to feed. Let us say we are able to save some endangered plants. But what will be its usefulness? Can it feed? can it be the ultimate answer for hungry stomachs? I can’t say for sure. It requires some high tech instruments to save just the genomes and dna of the species which are certainly the most useful ones like wheat, maize and rice. These are the major surplus that feeds the world. A lot of money are spent in saving theses but can our endangered species of plants like some weeds or any other species take the same place.
Similarly for animals, the worth and value has to be estimated. Sometimes we just have to let the mother nature play her hand. The natural selection is what had led us to the present and continue to do so. The survival of the fittest has always been the mantra to the existence. Sometimes the extinction of one species is what leads to the initiation of another. Do you think the homo sapiens would still rule the earth if dinosaurs remained and somehow escaped the extinction?
It feels as the most important task on hand is to save the endangered species no matter the expense of any new discoveries or humans life in any case. However, this doesn’t hold true. We will continue to evolve even if we let some of the species go. There is always new horizons to find, new doors to unlock.
In a nutshell, how compelling it may seem to protect the endangered species at any cost. Such actions would never be justified if done on the expense of must arresting needs like hunger and education. Furthermore the most technical jobs and costs may be way more effective in finding new treasures than depleting all for the protection of what we might lose in any case is inevitable. So, there is a new world to discover and for the species there is always a nature of law which says things such as "survival of the fittest" and "natural selection". All is not definitely not lost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 542, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...our campaign for the future. Spending a whole lot of time and money for saving in many ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Can
...at will be its usefulness? Can it feed? can it be the ultimate answer for hungry st...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...y other species take the same place. Similarly for animals, the worth and value has to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... will continue to evolve even if we let some of the species go. There is always new horizon...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 202, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...esting needs like hunger and education. Furthermore the most technical jobs and costs may b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'still', 'as to', 'such as', 'in any case', 'in many cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204411764706 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.167647058824 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0911764705882 0.0880659088768 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0573529411765 0.0497285424764 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0455882352941 0.0444667217837 103% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0941176470588 0.12292977631 77% => OK
Participles: 0.0382352941176 0.0406280797675 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57397479793 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0382352941176 0.030933414821 124% => OK
Particles: 0.00294117647059 0.0016655270985 177% => OK
Determiners: 0.110294117647 0.0997080785238 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.025 0.0249443105267 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0161764705882 0.0148568991511 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3409.0 2732.02544248 125% => OK
No of words: 608.0 452.878318584 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60690789474 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.58838876751 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.268092105263 0.366273622748 73% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.212171052632 0.280924506359 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.144736842105 0.200843997647 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0986842105263 0.132149295362 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57397479793 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 219.290929204 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475328947368 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 58.3941126684 55.4138127331 105% => OK
How many sentences: 37.0 20.6194690265 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.4324324324 23.380412469 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.914508022 59.4972553346 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1351351351 141.124799967 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4324324324 23.380412469 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.351351351351 0.674092028746 52% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 37.6495376956 51.4728631049 73% => OK
Elegance: 1.24456521739 1.64882698954 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264819040205 0.391690518653 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0722065292477 0.123202303941 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0723283390922 0.077325440228 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.451932020125 0.547984918172 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180606610005 0.149214159877 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956167936046 0.161403998019 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671480348859 0.0892212321368 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.479855296682 0.385218514788 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0506649378482 0.0692045440612 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200099298761 0.275328986314 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517332864162 0.0653680567796 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.4325221239 163% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88274336283 307% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.70907079646 295% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.