There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species
Society has trend to reward for the good effort and criticize the bad one. Saving those species- both plant and animal- so far is a laudatory attempt and societies are driving force to do so in future. So, I partially agree with the authors claim.
Society most often rewards those people whose efforts help to bring changes in the society or helps for the betterment of the people’s life. In fact, any effort either it be nugatory or huge if it helps to preserve the vulnerable plants and animals then it aids for conserving the biodiversity of the society and intimately help to achieve better life for its people. For instance, we usually hear the case in which the people are rewarded with different types of rewards for preserving the endangered animals. They are no less than the national heroes as they help to maintain pride of their country within others.
Similarly, nowadays people are increasingly becoming concern about their salubrious and ways to leave salubrious life. Only a balanced ecosystem can promote the healthy environment which fosters all types of plants and animals by maintaining ecological chain. So, people are spending lot of money and time to conserve and preserve the endangered species and increase the life expectancy. Just few days back, Nepalese government allocated almost one fourth of its budget to preserve the endangered species because this effort implies that Nepalese healthy and peace life.
However, sometimes some ignorant society may not rewards or praise those people who are toiling to make better world by preserving its vulnerable species. But this doesn’t mean they do it intentionally. Indeed they are unaware of the consequences that are going to happen or the changes that it would bring upon the peoples life.
In a nutshell, the author generalizes the case and states that society doesn’t give incentives for those people usually conserving vulnerable species. In fact, most of the society today value those efforts and rewards them with highest accolade.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
Society has trend to reward for the good effort and criti...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nd societies are driving force to do so in future. So, I partially agree with the authors...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...s;s life. In fact, any effort either it be nugatory or huge if it helps to preserv...
^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...n't mean they do it intentionally. Indeed they are unaware of the consequences th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...he changes that it would bring upon the peoples life. In a nutshell, the author gene...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...ay value those efforts and rewards them with highest accolade.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'for instance', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242506811989 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.16621253406 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0844686648501 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0599455040872 0.0497285424764 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0463215258856 0.0444667217837 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100817438692 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0408719346049 0.0406280797675 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66264159037 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0299727520436 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103542234332 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00817438692098 0.0249443105267 33% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0136239782016 0.0148568991511 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2040.0 2732.02544248 75% => OK
No of words: 330.0 452.878318584 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18181818182 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393939393939 0.366273622748 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309090909091 0.280924506359 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184848484848 0.200843997647 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121212121212 0.132149295362 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66264159037 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551515151515 0.48968727796 113% => OK
Word variations: 59.3643081351 55.4138127331 107% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 20.625 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4834502231 59.4972553346 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 141.124799967 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5625 0.674092028746 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 51.5340909091 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.41 1.64882698954 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231246074944 0.391690518653 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111470817093 0.123202303941 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0803245175377 0.077325440228 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.576645004322 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133749121366 0.149214159877 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982248494553 0.161403998019 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617417014172 0.0892212321368 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.272371041462 0.385218514788 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0580786178233 0.0692045440612 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157278447691 0.275328986314 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333458469159 0.0653680567796 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.