"We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
The issue statement says that people learn more from the views they share them rather than from whose view that contradict their own. As the human is the social being, and lives in society where exchange of customs and values takes place that chnage one's personality. I do agree with the authors statement but upto some extent, because there are many cases where this statement cannot be applied. My view point is described as follows;
Firstly, the man being a social being lives in the society where the people with different beliefs and ideas exist. Not everyone can have the same thinking and perception level. For example some people are in favor of child marriage while others are not. Many ideas are same between two people that means that idea will be promoted more as both do agree with that, and the idea works properly that will help in well being and better development of the society.
Secondly, as the man interacts with the other people in the society with different ideas and values there will be chances of contradiction, as in muslims killing of a cow is their custom but for hindus cow is a holy animal. But if we take the example in case of erudites, it is not true that the from one with different point of thinking we will not learn anything because everyone have different cognitive powers. For example in case of chemistry or any other science subject two people performing same experiment but in different ways, one with easy and other with difficult in this even though views of both are different. But both will learn something from each other.
Last but not the least, it does not depend more on view whether contradicting or similar it depends on the person whether he wants to learn or not . For example, in case of orthodox people it is very difficult to convince them about any new technology because they don't have the will power to learn anything new. Even if it is better than their one they still prefer to stick on their own. But in some cases orthodoxy is good too.
In the last i restate that, people learn more from the views share rather than from those we contradict. Moreover, it depends on the person whether he want a change or not. Too much of the orthodoxy is not good because it will lead you behind from other people in this world of modernization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The issue statement says that people learn more from the v...
^^
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... issue statement says that people learn more from the views they share them rat...
^^
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t says that people learn more from the views they share them rather than from w...
^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...toms and values takes place that chnage ones personality. I do agree with the author...
^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e ones personality. I do agree with the authors statement but upto some extent, because...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...t means that idea will be promoted more as both do agree with that, and the idea w...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...se of erudites, it is not true that the from one with different point of thinking we...
^^^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er. Last but not the least, it does not depend more on view whether contradictin...
^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... person whether he wants to learn or not . For example, in case of orthodox people...
^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...m about any new technology because they dont have the will power to learn anything n...
^^^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e the will power to learn anything new. Even if it is better than their one they still ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 403, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
...efer to stick on their own. But in some cases orthodoxy is good too. In the last i r...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ses orthodoxy is good too. In the last i restate that, people learn more from th...
^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...er, it depends on the person whether he want a change or not. Too much of the orthod...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59854014599 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29662959435 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442822384428 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1345660549 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339097855415 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115213208585 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157846430738 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21388505867 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117233588819 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.